Presentation collateral patterns and outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke
Regenhardt, R. W.; Lev, M. H.; He, J.; Dmytriw, A. A.; Vranic, J. E.; Rabinov, J. D.; Stapleton, C. J.; Patel, A. B.; Singhal, A. B.; Gonzalez, R. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundEndovascular thrombectomy (EVT) revolutionized large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. However, treatment decisions and prognostication are challenging without advanced imaging. We sought to determine the relationship of simple CTA collateral patterns and outcomes after EVT. MethodsWe identified patients with anterior LVO who underwent guideline based EVT from a single center from 2019-2020. Inclusion criteria were available CTA and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Arterial-phase CTA collaterals were categorized as malignant, other, or symmetric. ResultsAmong 74 patients, the median age was 75 and 49% were female. Collaterals were symmetric (36%), malignant (24%), or other (39%). Comparing collateral patterns there were no differences in demographics, presentations, time from last well, good reperfusion, or intracerebral hemorrhage. Median NIHSS was 18 for malignant, 19 for other, and 11 for symmetric (p=0.02). Intracranial ICA occlusions were present in 28% of malignant, 3% of other, and 11% of symmetric (p=0.04). Ninety-day mRS [≤]2 was achieved in 17% of malignant, 38% of other, and 67% of symmetric. Collateral pattern was a significant determinant of 90-day mRS [≤]2 (aOR=6.62, 95%CI=2.24,19.53; p=0.001) in a multivariable model including age, NIHSS, baseline mRS, thrombolysis, LVO location, and good reperfusion. ConclusionsSimple CTA collateral pattern is a robust determinant of 90-day outcomes after EVT. Further prospective studies are needed to understand how collateral pattern can guide EVT treatment decisions and long-term prognosis.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prehospital triage of intracranial hemorrhage and anterior large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: the value of the rapid arterial occlusion evalution 97%
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 96%
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions 97%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 96%
- Early recanalization among patients undergoing bridging therapy with tenecteplase or alteplase 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 96%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 96%
- Quantification of Patent Foramen Ovale Shunt Severity by Transesophageal Echocardiogram and Transcranial Doppler in Routine Clinical Practice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Identification of Thrombectomy Amenable Vessel Occlusion on Computed Tomography Angiography using Deep Learning 96%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 95%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 95%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 95%
- Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome after Stroke Independent of Reperfusion Grade 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.