Back

Efficacy and Safety of a Booster Regimen of Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19

Hardt, K.; Vandebosch, A.; Sadoff, J.; Le Gars, M.; Truyers, C.; Lowson, D.; Van Dromme, I.; Vingerhoets, J.; Kamphuis, T.; Scheper, G.; Ruiz-Guinazu, J.; Faust, S. N.; Spinner, C. D.; Schuitemaker, H.; Van Hoof, J.; Douoguih, M.; Struyf, F.

2022-01-31 infectious diseases
10.1101/2022.01.28.22270043 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite the availability of effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), the emergence of variant strains and breakthrough infections pose a challenging new reality. Booster vaccinations are needed to maintain vaccine-induced protection. MethodsENSEMBLE2 is an ongoing, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 pivotal trial including crossover vaccination after emergency authorization of Covid-19 vaccines. Adults aged [≥]18 years were randomized to receive Ad26.COV2.S or placebo as a primary dose plus a booster dose at two months. The primary endpoint was vaccine efficacy against the first occurrence of molecularly-confirmed moderate to severe-critical Covid-19 with onset [≥]14 days after booster vaccination in the per-protocol population. Key efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity endpoints were also assessed. ResultsThe double-blind phase enrolled 31,300 participants, 14,492 of whom received 2 doses and were evaluable for efficacy (per-protocol set, Ad26.COV2.S n=7484; placebo n=7008). Baseline demographics and characteristics were balanced. Vaccine efficacy was 75.2% (adjusted 95% CI, 54.6-87.3) against moderate to severe-critical Covid-19 and was similar against symptomatic infection (75.6% [55.5-99.9]). Efficacy was consistent across participants with and without comorbidities, and reached 93.7% (58.5-99.9) in the US. Vaccine efficacy against severe-critical Covid-19 was 100% (32.6-100.0; 0 vs 8 cases). The booster vaccine induced robust humoral responses and exhibited an acceptable safety profile. ConclusionsA homologous Ad26.COV2.S booster administered 2 months after primary single-dose vaccination in adults led to high vaccine efficacy, including against any symptomatic infection and SARS-CoV-2 variants prevalent during the study. (Funding: Janssen Research and Development and others; ENSEMBLE2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04614948.)

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
6
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
14
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
15
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%