Back

Ultraviolet Dosage and Decontamination Efficacy was Widely Variable Across 14 UV Devices after Testing a Dried Enveloped Ribonucleic Acid Virus Surrogate for SARS-CoV-2

Buhr, T. L.; Borgers-Klonkowski, E.; Gutting, B. W.; Hammer, E. E.; Hamilton, S. M.; Huhman, B. M.; Jackson, S. L.; Kennihan, N. L.; Lilly, S. D.; Little, J. D.; Luck, B. B.; Matuczinski, E. A.; Miller, C. T.; Sides, R. E.; Yates, V. L.; Young, A. A.

2022-08-10 microbiology
10.1101/2022.01.27.478063 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractO_ST_ABSAimsC_ST_ABSThe dosages and efficacy of 14 ultraviolet (UV) decontamination technologies were measured against a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus that was dried on to different materials for lab and field testing. Methods and ResultsA live enveloped, ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus surrogate for SARS- CoV-2 was dried on stainless steel 304 (SS304), Navy Top Coat-painted SS304 (NTC), cardboard, polyurethane, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) at > 8.0 log10 plaque-forming units (PFU) per test coupon. The coupons were then exposed to UV radiation during both lab and field testing. Commercial and prototype UV- emitting devices were measured for efficacy: 4 handheld devices, 3 room/surface-disinfecting machines, 5 air-disinfection devices, and 2 larger custom-made machines. UV device dosages ranged from 0.01-729 mJ cm-2. Anti-viral efficacy among the different UV devices ranged from no decontamination up to nearly achieving sterilization. Importantly, cardboard required far more dosage than SS304. ConclusionsEnormous variability in dosage and efficacy was measured among the different UV devices. Porous materials limit the utility of UV decontamination. Significance and Impact of the StudyUV devices have wide variability in dosages, efficacy, hazards, and UV output over time indicating that each UV device needs independent technical measurement and assessment for product development, prior to, and during use.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
30.3%
2
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
7.2%
4
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
8
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
9
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
10
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
11
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
12
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Journal of Hospital Infection
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
18
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
21
Current Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
22
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Journal of General Virology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%