How to use transcriptomic data for game-theoretic modeling of treatment-induced resistance in cancer cells?A case study in patient-derived glioblastoma organoids
Gaska, W.; Lokh, C.; Verduin, M.; Hubert, C. G.; Vooijs, M.; Cavill, R.; Stankova, K.
Show abstract
Game theory is a powerful tool to model strategic decision making, but also interactions within Darwinian biological systems, such as cancer. As such, in the past decades, game-theoretical models have helped to understand cancer, its response to various treatments, and to design better therapies. However, to fully utilize the potential of game-theoretical modelling in designing better anti-cancer therapies, we need more information on cancer population (ecological) and strategy (evolutionary) dynamics in response to treatment for each patient and their tumors. Here we explore how transcriptomics data can be utilized as an input of game-theoretical models for predicting evolutionary response to irradiation in patient-derived glioblastoma organoids. For that purpose, we utilize both supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods to identify relevant cancer cell types and how their proportions change over time in the organoids. We then fit these proportions to the replicator dynamics, the most common evolutionary game dynamics, to predict both transient evolutionary dynamics and evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) cell proportions. Our predictions in glioblastoma organoids suggest that hypoxia is the most important factor in identifying short-term response to irradiation, while this seems much less relevant for the long-term response corresponding to the ESSs. Further, we conclude that supervised methods are the best way to estimate cancer evolutionary dynamics when therapy resistance is a qualitative evolutionary trait. We believe that our methodology can help in designing better therapies through testing evolutionary responses in patient-derived organoids, while in parallel the ecological response can be tracked through serum biomarkers and imaging in the corresponding patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining Hypoxia-Activated Prodrugs and Radiotherapy in silico: Impact of Treatment Scheduling and the Intra-Tumoural Oxygen Landscape 97%
- A mesoscopic simulator to uncover heterogeneity and evolutionary dynamics in tumors 96%
- Enhanced perfusion following exposure to radiotherapy: a theoretical investigation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A topic modelling analysis of TCGA breast and lung cancer transcriptomic data 95%
- Are adaptive chemotherapy schedules robust? A three-strategy stochastic evolutionary game theory model 93%
- Agent-Based Modeling of Virtual Tumors Reveals the Critical Influence of Microenvironmental Complexity on Immunotherapy Efficacy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MFmap: A semi-supervised generative model matching cell lines to tumours and cancer subtypes 95%
- Heterogeneous run-and-tumble motion accounts for transient non-Gaussian super-diffusion in haematopoietic multi-potent progenitor cells 95%
- Extreme value theory as a general framework for understanding mutation frequency distribution in cancer genomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An in silico exploration of combining Interleukin-12 with Oxaliplatin to treat liver-metastatic colorectal cancer 94%
- Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review 92%
- Is more better? An analysis of toxicity and response outcomes from dose-finding clinical trials in cancer 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.