Selecting an effective amplitude threshold for neural spike detection
zhang, z.; Constandinou, T.
Show abstract
This paper assesses and challenges whether commonly used methods for defining amplitude thresholds for spike detection are optimal. This is achieved through empirical testing of single amplitude thresholds across multiple recordings of varying SNR levels. Our results suggest that the most widely used noise-statistics-driven threshold can suffer from parameter deviation in different noise levels. The spike-noise-driven threshold can be an ideal approach to set the threshold for spike detection, which suffers less from the parameter deviation and is robust to sub-optimal settings.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel machine learning-based approach for the detection and analysis of spontaneous synaptic currents 96%
- A new method of Bayesian causal inference in non-stationary environments 95%
- 3 Directional Inception-ResUNet: deep spatial feature learning for multichannel singing voice separation with distortion 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifiability analysis and noninvasive online estimation of the first-order neural activation dynamics in the brain with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation 94%
- A Model-Based Approach for Pulse Selection from Electrodermal Activity 93%
- Resource-efficient Neural Network Architectures forClassifying Nerve Cuff Recordings on Implantable Devices 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sparse Ensemble Machine Learning to improve robustness of long-term decoding in iBMIs 95%
- ScoreNet: A Neural network-based post-processing model for identifying epileptic seizure onset and offset in EEGs 94%
- Chirp analyzer for estimating amplitude and latency of steady-state auditory envelope following responses 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.