Back

Should healthcare workers with SARS-CoV-2 household exposures work? A Cohort Study.

Quach, C.; Blanchard, A. C.; Lamarche, J.; Audy, N.; Lamarre, V.

2022-01-24 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2022.01.23.22269719 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceDue to high community transmission of the Omicron variant, healthcare workers (HCWs) have been increasingly reporting household exposures to confirmed COVID-19 cases. Quebec (Canada) provincial guidelines required to quarantine these HCWs. Facing the risk of staffing shortages, our hospital decided to allow them to work. ObjectiveTo evaluate the risk for HCWs, who were household contacts, to become positive for COVID-19 by RT-PCR and evaluate the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 transmission. DesignCohort of HCWs with a history of household exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19. SettingCHU Sainte-Justine, a tertiary care mother and child center in Montreal (QC) Canada ParticipantsConsecutive HCWs who contacted OHS between December 20, 2021 and January 17, 2022 for a history of household exposure to COVID-19. ExposureConfirmed case of COVID-19 in the household Main outcome and measuresThe main outcome was a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Outbreaks and nosocomial cases were identified through daily analysis of COVID-19 cases, by sector and part of the usual Infection Prevention and Control surveillance process. ResultsOverall, 237 of 475 (50%) HCWs who declared a known household contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case remained negative. Of those who became positive, 196 (82.4%) were positive upon initial testing and were quarantined. Only 42 (15%) of 279 HCWs who were allowed to work became positive, a median of 4 days after the initial test. The absence of symptoms at initial evaluation (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5-5.7) and having received a third vaccine dose more than 7 days before (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.3 - 2.8) were associated with an increased odds of remaining negative. There was no outbreak among HCWs and no nosocomial transmission to patients from a HCW that was allowed to work, while a known household contact. Conclusion and relevanceMeasures taken to protect the health care environment from COVID-19 must be cautiously balanced with the risk of staffing shortage. Allowing vaccinated asymptomatic HCWs who are known household contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases to work is likely a safe alternative, when staff shortage is anticipated.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
9
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
20
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
21
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%