Should healthcare workers with SARS-CoV-2 household exposures work? A Cohort Study.
Quach, C.; Blanchard, A. C.; Lamarche, J.; Audy, N.; Lamarre, V.
Show abstract
ImportanceDue to high community transmission of the Omicron variant, healthcare workers (HCWs) have been increasingly reporting household exposures to confirmed COVID-19 cases. Quebec (Canada) provincial guidelines required to quarantine these HCWs. Facing the risk of staffing shortages, our hospital decided to allow them to work. ObjectiveTo evaluate the risk for HCWs, who were household contacts, to become positive for COVID-19 by RT-PCR and evaluate the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 transmission. DesignCohort of HCWs with a history of household exposure to a confirmed case of COVID-19. SettingCHU Sainte-Justine, a tertiary care mother and child center in Montreal (QC) Canada ParticipantsConsecutive HCWs who contacted OHS between December 20, 2021 and January 17, 2022 for a history of household exposure to COVID-19. ExposureConfirmed case of COVID-19 in the household Main outcome and measuresThe main outcome was a positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Outbreaks and nosocomial cases were identified through daily analysis of COVID-19 cases, by sector and part of the usual Infection Prevention and Control surveillance process. ResultsOverall, 237 of 475 (50%) HCWs who declared a known household contact with a confirmed COVID-19 case remained negative. Of those who became positive, 196 (82.4%) were positive upon initial testing and were quarantined. Only 42 (15%) of 279 HCWs who were allowed to work became positive, a median of 4 days after the initial test. The absence of symptoms at initial evaluation (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5-5.7) and having received a third vaccine dose more than 7 days before (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.3 - 2.8) were associated with an increased odds of remaining negative. There was no outbreak among HCWs and no nosocomial transmission to patients from a HCW that was allowed to work, while a known household contact. Conclusion and relevanceMeasures taken to protect the health care environment from COVID-19 must be cautiously balanced with the risk of staffing shortage. Allowing vaccinated asymptomatic HCWs who are known household contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases to work is likely a safe alternative, when staff shortage is anticipated.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupational versus community risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees of a long-term care facility: an observational study 93%
- Use of respirator vs. surgical masks in healthcare personnel and its impact on SARS-CoV-2 acquisition – a prospective multicentre cohort study 90%
- Low frequency of community-acquired bacterial co-infection in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 based on clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria; a retrospective cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expanding cholera serosurveillance to vaccinated populations 88%
- BCG vaccination of healthcare workers does not reduce SARS-CoV-2 infections nor infection severity or duration: a randomised placebo-controlled trial 88%
- Robustness of the ferret model for influenza risk assessment studies: a cross-laboratory exercise 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 91%
- Strategies to Estimate Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Texas Vulnerable Population: Results from Phase I of the Texas Coronavirus Antibody REsponse Survey (TX CARES) 91%
- Clinical And Serological Predictors Of Post COVID-19 Condition – Findings From A Canadian Prospective Cohort Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.