Back

Impact of COVID-19 symptoms on social aspects of life of female long haulers: A qualitative study

Aghaei, A.; Zhang, R.; Taylor, S.; Tam, C. C.; Yang, C.-H.; Li, X.; Qiao, S.

2022-01-23 public and global health
10.1101/2022.01.21.22269671 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPersistent COVID-19 symptoms (long COVID) may bring numerous challenges to long haulers social lives. Women may have to endure more profound impacts given their social roles and existing structural inequality. This study aims to explore the impacts of long COVID on various aspects of social life among female long haulers. MethodsWe conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with female long haulers in the United States purposely recruited from Facebook groups, Slack groups, and organization websites. The interviews were audio recorded after appropriate consent and transcribed verbatim. Inductive approach was applied in thematic analysis, which consists of six stages: becoming familiar with data, developing initial codes, extracting themes, refining themes, labeling themes, and reporting. The MAXQDA software was used in data analysis. ResultsPersistent COVID-19 symptoms negatively affected female long haulers social lives in many aspects including physical function, financial security, social relationship, conflict of social roles, and social stigma. Physical limitations changed their body image. Social isolation and work-family conflicts caused huge stress. They experienced internalization of stigma and job insecurities. Shifting to new methods of communication, especially social media may buffer the negative effects of social isolation because of long COVID. ConclusionExisting policies and intervention programs need to be adapted to address the challenges and barriers that long haulers face in returning to normal social life, especially for females. Tailored social life-related recommendations and social support are needed for female long haulers.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.