Wildlife and Marine Mammal Spatial Observatory: Observation and automated detection of Southern Right Whales in multispectral satellite imagery
Houegnigan, L.; Romero Merino, E.; Vermeulen, E.; Block, J.; Safari, P.; Moreno-Noguer, F.; Nadeu, C.
Show abstract
The Wildlife and Marine Mammal Spatial Observatory is a joint research effort for the census of wildlife and particularly of marine mammals in satellite imagery. In that context, this paper illustrates the development of a high accuracy algorithm for the detection of right whales in sub-meter resolution multispectral satellite imagery with the constraint of a relatively small sample support of 580 southern right whale images. A significant space is devoted to exploratory data analysis to describe the statistical structure of right whale pixels and ocean surface pixels across multispectral bands. Observations of southern right whale in satellite imagery are divided into typical and atypical right whale forms and the first observations of right whale mother and calf pairs in satellite imagery are presented. Measurements of whales are furthermore automatically extracted from whale observations (major axis length, minor axis length, etc). A significant space is also devoted to statistical data exploration, a step frequently overlooked in machine learning solutions, that yet offers interesting insight into the structure of animal detection in satellite imagery. The extracted statistics can readily be used by researchers to develop detection solutions even with low sample support. The adopted solution for detection consists of feature extraction with a convolutional neural network followed by classification with a support vector machine. 20 different convolutional neural networks were tested for feature extraction. Biostatistics parameters (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision) were measured for comparison. Most architectures generally achieved high performance with low false positive and false negative rates. 100% accuracy is achieved in the case of 2 convolutional neural networks, Nasnet Large and Inception V3, and only with a specific selection of multispectral bands. NB: This is a preprint that does not include satellite imagery due recent reviews
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic detection, identification and counting of anguilliform fish using in situ acoustic camera data: development of a cross-camera morphological analysis approach 95%
- A framework for the development of a global standardised marine taxon reference image database (SMarTaR-ID) to support image-based analyses 95%
- Passive acoustic methods for tracking the 3D movements of small cetaceans around marine structures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact evaluation of score classes and annotation regions in deep learning-based dairy cow body condition prediction 94%
- Welfare at group and individual level: optical flow patterns of broiler chicken flocks are correlated with the behaviour of individual birds 92%
- SARS-CoV-2, a threat to marine mammals? A study from Italian seawaters 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Throughput and Accurate 3D Scanning of Cattle Using Time-of-Flight Sensors and Deep Learning 94%
- An automated light trap to monitor moths (Lepidoptera) using computer vision-based tracking and deep learning 94%
- A computational study on the role of parameters for identification of thyroid nodules by infrared images (and its comparison with real data) 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.