3D MRI atlases of congenital aortic arch anomalies and normal fetal heart: application to automated multi-label segmentation
Uus, A.; van Poppel, M. P. M.; Steinweg, J. K.; Grigorescu, I.; Egloff Collado, A.; Ramirez Gilliland, P.; Roberts, T. A.; Hajnal, J. V.; Rutherford, M. A.; Lloyd, D. F. A.; Pushparajah, K.; Deprez, M.
Show abstract
Background3D image-domain reconstruction of black blood contrast T2w SSTSE fetal MRI datasets using slice-to-volume registration methods showed to provide high-resolution 3D images of the heart with superior visualisation of fetal aortic arch anomalies [1]. However, there is a lack of formalisation of the MRI appearance of fetal cardiovascular anatomy and standardisation of vessel segmentation protocols. MethodsIn this work, we present the first set of 3D fetal MRI atlases defining normal and abnormal fetal aortic arch anatomy created from 3D reconstructed images from 87 subjects scanned between 29-34 weeks of gestation with postnatally confirmed outcomes. We also implement and evaluate atlas-guided registration and deep learning (UNETR) methods for automated 3D multi-label fetal heart vessel segmentation. ResultsWe created four atlases representing the average anatomy of the normal fetal heart, coarctation of the aorta, right aortic arch and suspected double aortic arch. Inspection of atlases confirmed the expected pronounced differences in the anatomy of the aortic arch. The results of the multi-label heart vessel UNETR segmentation showed 100% per-vessel detection rate for both normal and abnormal aortic arch anatomy. ConclusionsThis work introduces the first set of 3D black blood T2w MRI atlases of the normal and abnormal fetal cardiovascular anatomy along with detailed segmentation of the major cardiovascular structures. We also demonstrated the feasibility of using deep learning for multi-label vessel segmentation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ventricular anatomical complexity and gender differences impact predictions from computational models 94%
- Development of a Novel Index to Characterise Arterial Dynamics Using Ultrasound Imaging 94%
- {-}CardiOvascular examination in awake Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus): Low-stress Echocardiography including Speckle Tracking imaging (the COOLEST method) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reproducibility of 4D Flow MRI-based Personalized Cardiovascular Models; Inter-sequence, Intra-observer, and Inter-observer variability 96%
- Automated cervix biometry, volumetry and normative models for 3D motion-corrected T2-weighted 0.55-3T fetal MRI during 2nd and 3rd trimesters 95%
- Indexing Cerebrovascular Health Using Near-infrared Spectroscopy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated IntraVascular UltraSound Image Processing and Quantification of Coronary Artery Anomalies: The AIVUS-CAA software 95%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 94%
- BRAVEHEART: Open-source software for automated electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning-based end-to-end automated stenosis classification and localization on catheter coronary angiography 95%
- Clinical evaluation of the Multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T1 and T2 mapping 95%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.