Back

Sero-Prevalence of Covid-19 among workers in Malaysia

Noordin, N. M.; Omar, A.; Isharudin, I. H.; Idris, R.; Chem, Y.; Mat Sahat, I. S.; Sengol, S.; Aziz, Z. A.; Lim, Z. z.; Lim, T. O.

2022-01-17 epidemiology
10.1101/2022.01.16.22269388
Show abstract

From the beginning of the pandemic in Feb 2020, Malaysia has been through 4 waves of outbreak, the magnitude of each wave is several orders larger than the preceding one. By the end of the fourth wave in October 2021, Malaysia has among the highest death toll in Asia, cumulative incidence of confirmed cases has reached 7.0% (>30% in Klang Valley). However it remains uncertain what is the true proportion of the population infected. We conducted a sero-survey on 1078 workers from 17 worksites in Klang Valley and Perak between July and September 2021. We tested them for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies using Ecotest, a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA). The ability of antibody testing to detect prior infection depends on the assay and sero-reversion. We therefore adjusted the prevalence estimates to correct for potential misclassification bias due to the use of LFIA and sero-reversion using test sensitivity and specificity results estimated from an independent validation study. The mean age of the workers was 32 years, 89% were male and migrant workers comprised 81% of all subjects, 59% the subjects were from Klang valley. 33% of workers had prior RT-PCR confirmed Covid-19 infections. We estimated 82.2 percent of workers had been infected by Covid-19 by July-September 2021. Prevalence was 99.9% among migrant workers and 12.1% among local workers. Klang Valley, the most industrialized region in Malaysia where most migrant workers are found, had 100% prevalence, giving an infection-to-case ratio (ICF) of [~]3. Our sero-prevalence results show that the incidence of Covid19 is extremely high among migrant workers in Malaysia, consistent with findings from other countries such as Kuwait and Singapore which also hosted large number of migrant workers.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 35%
13.6%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 11%
11.4%
3
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 0.5%
5.4%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 5%
4.6%
5
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
6
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 5%
4.6%
7
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 11%
2.9%
10
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 30%
2.9%
11
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 6%
2.3%
12
IJID Regions
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 14%
2.3%
14
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Journal of Travel Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
18
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
21
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
24
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
25
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 13%
0.7%
26
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 19%
0.7%