Back

Allometric tissue-scale forces activate mechanoresponsive immune cells to drive pathological foreign body response to biomedical implants

Padmanabhan, J.; Chen, K.; Sivaraj, D.; Kuehlmann, B. A.; Bonham, C. A.; Dohi, T.; Henn, D.; Stern-Buchbinder, Z. A.; Than, P. A.; Hosseini, H. S.; Barrera, J. A.; Kussie, H. C.; Magbual, N. J.; Borrelli, M. R.; Trotsyuk, A. A.; Kwon, S. H.; Dunn, J. C. Y.; Maan, Z. N.; Januszyk, M.; Prantl, L.; Gurtner, G. C.

2022-01-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.01.14.476395 bioRxiv
Show abstract

For decades, it has been assumed that the foreign body response (FBR) to biomedical implants is primarily a reaction to the chemical and mechanical properties of the implant. Here, we show for the first time that a third independent variable, allometric tissue-scale forces (which increase exponentially with body size), can drive the biology of FBR in humans. We first demonstrate that pathological FBR in humans is mediated by immune cell-specific Rac2 mechanotransduction signaling, independent of implant chemistry or mechanical properties. We then show that mice, which are typically poor models of human FBR, can be made to induce a strikingly human-like pathological FBR by altering these extrinsic tissue forces. Altering these extrinsic tissue forces alone activates Rac2 signaling in a unique subpopulation of immune cells and results in a human-like pathological FBR at the molecular, cellular, and local tissue levels. Finally, we demonstrate that blocking Rac2 signaling negates the effect of increased tissue forces, dramatically reducing FBR. These findings highlight a previously unsuspected mechanism for pathological FBR and may have profound implications for the design and safety of all implantable devices in humans. One-Sentence SummaryAllometric tissue-scale forces at the implant-tissue interface drive pathological foreign body response.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.