Simple risk scores to predict hospitalization or death in outpatients with COVID-19
Ebell, M.; Hamadani, R.; Kieber-Emmons, A.
Show abstract
ImportanceOutpatient physicians need guidance to support their clinical decisions regarding management of patients with COVID-19, specifically whether to hospitalize a patient or if managed as an outpatient, how closely to follow them. ObjectiveTo develop and prospectively validate a clinical prediction rule to predict the likelihood of hospitalization for outpatients with COVID-19 that does not require laboratory testing or imaging, including during the current Omicron wave. DesignDerivation and temporal validation of a clinical prediction rule, and prospective validation of two externally derived clinical prediction rules. SettingPrimary and urgent care clinics in a Pennsylvania health system. ParticipantsPatients 12 years and older presenting to outpatient clinics who had a positive polymerase chain reaction test for COVID-19. Main outcomes and measuresClassification accuracy (percentage in each risk group hospitalized) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsOverall, 4.0% of outpatients in the early derivation cohort (5843 patients presenting before 3/1/21), 4.2% in the late validation cohort (3806 patients presenting 3/1/21 to 9/30/21), and 1.9% in an Omicron cohort were ultimately hospitalized. We developed and temporally validated four simple risk scores. The base score included age, dyspnea, and the presence of a comorbidity, with the other scores adding fever, respiratory rate and/or oxygen saturation. All had very good overall accuracy (AUC 0.85-0.87) and classified at least half of patients into a low risk with a < 1% likelihood of hospitalization. Hospitalization rates in the Omicron cohort were 0.22%, 1.3% and 8.7% for the base score. Two externally derived risk scores identified more low risk patients, but with a higher overall risk of hospitalization than our novel risk scores. Conclusions and relevanceA simple risk score applicable to outpatient and telehealth settings can classify over half of COVID-19 outpatients into a very low risk group with a 0.22% hospitalization risk in the Omicron cohort. The Lehigh Outpatient COVID Hospitalization (LOCH) risk score is available online as a free app: https://ebell-projects.shinyapps.io/LehighRiskScore/. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs it possible to predict the eventual likelihood of hospitalization for outpatients with COVID-19 using simple non-laboratory based risk scores? FindingsWe created and temporally validated in the same population 4 risk scores with 3 to 5 predictors that do not require laboratory testing. Groups with low (0.34% to 0.89%), moderate (4.0% to 6.2%), and high-risk (19.2% to 25.2%) of hospitalization were identified. The risk scores were also accurate in an Omicron dominant cohort with hospitalization rates of 0.22% to 0.43% in the low-risk groups, 1.3% to 1.7% in the moderate risk groups, and 8.7% to 15.3% in the high risk groups. MeaningSimple risk scores can help support decisions about hospitalization in the outpatient setting.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Initial Experience in Predicting the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients with COVID-19 Using a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool 94%
- Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States with surveillance data using a Bayesian Hierarchical model 93%
- Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 96%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) 95%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 94%
- Performance of intensive care unit severity scoring systems across different ethnicities. 91%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.