Back

Continuous B- to A- Transition in Protein-DNA Binding - How Well Is It Described by Current AMBER Force Fields?

Jurecka, P.; Zgarbova, M.; Cerny, F.; Salomon, J.

2022-01-13 biophysics
10.1101/2022.01.13.476176 bioRxiv
Show abstract

When DNA interacts with a protein, its structure often undergoes significant conformational adaptation. Perhaps the most common is the transition from canonical B-DNA towards the A-DNA form, which is not a two-state, but rather a continuous transition. The A- and B-forms differ mainly in sugar pucker P (north/south) and glycosidic torsion {chi} (high-anti/anti). The combination of A-like P and B-like {chi} (and vice versa) represents the nature of the intermediate states lying between the pure A- and B- forms. In this work, we study how the A/B equilibrium and in particular the A/B intermediate states, which are known to be over-represented at protein-DNA interfaces, are modeled by current AMBER force fields. Eight protein-DNA complexes and their naked (unbound) DNAs were simulated with OL15 and bsc1 force fields as well as an experimental combination OL15{chi}OL3. We found that while the geometries of the A-like intermediate states in the molecular dynamics (MD) simulations agree well with the native X-ray geometries found in the protein-DNA complexes, their populations (stabilities) are significantly underestimated. Different force fields predict different propensities for A-like states growing in the order OL15 < bsc1 < OL15{chi}OL3, but the overall populations of the A-like form are too low in all of them. Interestingly, the force fields seem to predict the correct sequence-dependent A-form propensity, as they predict larger populations of the A-like form in naked (unbound) DNA in those steps that acquire A-like conformations in protein-DNA complexes. The instability of A-like geometries in current force fields may significantly alter the geometry of the simulated protein-DNA complex, destabilize the binding motif, and reduce the binding energy, suggesting that refinement is needed to improve description of protein-DNA interactions in AMBER force fields.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.9%
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
4
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
16
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%