Back

The impact of depression diagnosis on diabetes and lifetime hyperglycaemia

Hagenaars, S. P.; Gillett, A. C.; Casanova, F.; Young, K. G.; Green, H. D.; Lewis, C.; Tyrrell, J.

2022-01-13 endocrinology
10.1101/2022.01.13.22269229 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study evaluates longitudinal associations between glycaemic control (mean and within-patient variability of glycated haemaglobin (HbA1c) levels) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and major depressive disorder (MDD), focusing on the timings of these diagnoses. MethodsIn UK Biobank, T2D was defined using self-report and linked health outcome data, then validated using polygenic scores. Repeated HbA1c measurements (mmol/mol) over the 10 years following T2D diagnosis were outcomes in mixed effects models, with T2D disease duration included using restricted cubic splines. Four MDD exposures were considered: MDD diagnosis prior to T2D diagnosis (pre-T2D MDD), time between pre-T2D MDD diagnosis and T2D, new MDD diagnosis during follow-up (post-T2D MDD) and time since post-T2D MDD diagnosis. Models with and without covariate adjustment were considered. ResultsT2D diagnostic criteria were robustly associated with T2D polygenic scores. In 11,837 T2D cases (6.9 year median follow-up), pre-T2D MDD was associated with a 0.92 increase in HbA1c (95% CI: [0.00, 1.84]), but earlier pre-T2D MDD diagnosis correlated with lower HbA1c. These pre-T2D MDD effects became non-significant after covariate adjustment. Post-T2D MDD individuals demonstrated increasing HbA1c with years since MDD diagnosis (/3 = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.17, 0.86]). Retrospectively, looking across all follow-up, within-patient variability in HbA1c was 1.16 (95% CI: 1.13-1.19) times higher in post-T2D MDD. ConclusionsThe timing of MDD diagnosis is important for understanding glycaemic control in T2D. Poorer control was observed in MDD diagnosed post-T2D, highlighting the importance of depression screening in T2D, and closer monitoring for individuals who develop MDD after T2D.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
3
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
4
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
6
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%