Back

Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nnate, D. A.; Ajayi, K. V.; Hossain, M. M.; Guerby, P.

2022-01-13 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2022.01.13.22269011 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveStudies on psychosocial interventions for perinatal mental health and wellbeing are mostly limited to the postpartum period. However, the physiological changes associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy predisposes women to severe psychological distress and adverse birth outcomes. This review investigated the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. MethodsCochrane CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, MIDIRS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and Web of Science were searched up to 22nd August 2021. Effect sizes on relevant health outcomes were pooled in a meta-analysis using STATA software. ResultsEight randomised trials involving 460 participants met the inclusion criteria. Included studies adopted several interventions ranging from music, exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), spiritual care education and psychoeducation. The pooled effect showed a significant reduction in anxiety (d= -0.35 [-0.58, -0.11], p=0.004) and depression (d= -0.37 [-0.57, -0.17], p=0.0003). Spiritual care education significantly reduced postpartum stress disorder (d= -62.00 [-93.10, -30.90], p= 0.0001). However, CBT showed no effect on gestational stress (d= -2.20 [-4.89, 0.48], p= 0.11). ConclusionThis study provides satisfactory evidence that psychosocial interventions may likely reduce anxiety and depression associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. However, the evidence is very uncertain about its effect on neonatal outcomes. Summary of findings O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e79837org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ba7c46org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@34ff88org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1744101org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@157c61e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.9%
2
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.9%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
6
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
7
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
8
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
14
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
22
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%