Algorithmic Fairness and Bias Mitigation for Clinical Machine Learning: Insights from Rapid COVID-19 Diagnosis by Adversarial Learning
Yang, J.; Soltan, A. A.; Yang, Y.; Clifton, D. A.
Show abstract
Machine learning is becoming increasingly prominent in healthcare. Although its benefits are clear, growing attention is being given to how machine learning may exacerbate existing biases and disparities. In this study, we introduce an adversarial training framework that is capable of mitigating biases that may have been acquired through data collection or magnified during model development. For example, if one class is over-presented or errors/inconsistencies in practice are reflected in the training data, then a model can be biased by these. To evaluate our adversarial training framework, we used the statistical definition of equalized odds. We evaluated our model for the task of rapidly predicting COVID-19 for patients presenting to hospital emergency departments, and aimed to mitigate regional (hospital) and ethnic biases present. We trained our framework on a large, real-world COVID-19 dataset and demonstrated that adversarial training demonstrably improves outcome fairness (with respect to equalized odds), while still achieving clinically-effective screening performances (NPV>0.98). We compared our method to the benchmark set by related previous work, and performed prospective and external validation on four independent hospital cohorts. Our method can be generalized to any outcomes, models, and definitions of fairness.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 95%
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 95%
- Enhancing Fairness in Disease Prediction by Optimizing Multiple Domain Adversarial Networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Addressing Label Noise for Electronic Health Records: Insights from Computer Vision for Tabular Data 97%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 95%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 98%
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 96%
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information 95%
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 95%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.