Machine Learning for Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study
Yu, Z.; Wongvibulsin, S.; Daya, N. R.; Zhou, L.; Matsushita, K.; Natarajan, P.; Coresh, J.; Zeger, S. L.
Show abstract
IntroductionSudden cardiac death (SCD) is a devastating consequence often without antecedent expectation. Current risk stratification methods derived from baseline independently modeled risk factors are insufficient. Novel random forest machine learning (ML) approach incorporating time-dependent variables and complex interactions may improve SCD risk prediction. MethodsAtherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants were followed for adjudicated SCD. ML models were compared to standard Poisson regression models for interval data, an approximation to Cox regression, with stepwise variable selection. Eighty-two time-varying variables (demographics, lifestyle factors, clinical characteristics, biomarkers, etc.) collected at four visits over 12 years (1987-98) were used as candidate predictors. Predictive accuracy was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) through out-of-bag prediction for ML models and 5-fold cross validation for the Poisson regression models. ResultsOver a median follow-up time of 23.5 years, 583 SCD events occurred among 15,661 ARIC participants (mean age 54 years and 55% women). Compared to different Poisson regression models (AUC at 6-year ranges from 0.77-0.83), the ML model improved prediction (AUC at 6-year 0.89). Top predictors identified by ML model included prior coronary heart disease, which explained 47.9% of the total phenotypic variance, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and T wave abnormality in any of leads I, aVL, or V6. Using the top ML predictors to select variables, the Poisson regression model AUC at 6-year was 0.77 suggesting that the non-linear dependencies and interactions captured by ML, are the main reasons for its improved prediction performance. ConclusionsApplying novel ML approach with time-varying predictors improves the prediction of SCD. Interactions of dynamic clinical characteristics are important for risk-stratifying SCD in the general population.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 96%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 96%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 95%
- Declining Trend of Sudden Cardiac Death in Younger Individuals: A 20–Year Nationwide Study 94%
- Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: the VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 96%
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 94%
- Effects of Singing on Vascular Health in Older Adults with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-Specific Clinical and Genetic Factors Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
- A polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease performs well in individuals aged 70 years and older 95%
- Natural History, Phenotype Spectrum and Clinical Outcomes of Desmin ( DES )-Associated Cardiomyopathy 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.