Back

Consumer-driven nutrient recycling of freshwater decapods: linking ecological theories and application in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture

Musin, G.; Torres, M. V.; Carvalho, D. d. A.

2022-01-11 ecology
10.1101/2022.01.11.475807 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractThe Metabolic Theory of Ecology (MET) and the Ecological Stoichiometry Theory (EST) are central and complementary in the consumer-driven recycling conceptual basis. The comprehension of physiological processes of organisms at different levels of organizations is essential to explore and predict nutrient recycling behavior in different scenarios, and to design integrated productive systems that efficiently use the nutrient inputs through an adjusted mass balance. We fed with fish-feed three species of decapods from different families and with aquacultural potential to explore the animal-mediated nutrient dynamic and its applicability in productive systems. We tested whether physiological (body mass, body elemental content), ecological (diet), taxonomic and experimental (time of incubation) variables predicts N and P excretion rates and ratios across and within taxa. We also analysed body mass and body elemental content independently as predictors of N and P excretion of decapods across, among and within taxa. Finally, we verified if body content scales allometrically across and within taxa and if differed among taxa. Body mass and taxonomic identity predicted nutrient excretion rates both across and within taxa. When physiological variables were analysed independently, body size best predicted nutrient mineralization in both scales of analyses. Regarding body elemental content, only body P content scaled negatively with body mass across taxa. Results showed higher N-requirements and lower C:N of prawns than anomurans and crabs. The role of crustaceans as nutrient recyclers depends mainly on the species and body mass, and should be considered to select complementary species that efficiently use feed resources. Prawns need more protein in their feed and might be integrated with fish of higher N-requirements, while crabs and anomurans, with fish of lower N-requirements. Our study contributed to the background of MTE and EST through empirical data obtained from decapods and provided useful information to achieve more efficient aquaculture integration systems.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
3
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
14
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
19
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
22
Journal of Phycology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
23
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
27
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%