Quantifying behavior change during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States
Chao, D. L.; Cho, V.; Izzo, A. S.; Proctor, J. L.; Zimmermann, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the most effective way to reduce transmission and to protect oneself was to reduce contact with others. However, it is unclear how behavior changed, despite numerous surveys about peoples attitudes and actions during the pandemic and public health efforts to influence behavior. MethodsWe used two sources of data to quantify changes in behavior at the county level during the first year of the pandemic in the United States: aggregated mobile device (smartphone) location data to approximate the fraction of people staying at home each day and digital invitation data to capture the number and size of social gatherings. ResultsBetween mid-March to early April 2020, the number of events fell and the fraction of devices staying at home peaked, independently of when states issued emergency orders or stay-at-home recommendations. Activity began to recover in May or June, with later rebounds in counties that suffered an early spring wave of reported COVID-19 cases. Counties with high incidence in the summer had more events, higher mobility, and less stringent state-level COVID-related restrictions the month before than counties with low incidence. Counties with high incidence in early fall stayed at home less and had less stringent state-level COVID-related restrictions in October, when cases began to rise in some parts of the US. During the early months of the pandemic, the number of events was inversely correlated with the fraction of devices staying at home, but after the fall of 2020 mobility appeared to stay constant as the number of events fell. Greater changes in behavior were observed in counties where a larger fraction voted for Biden in the 2020 US Presidential election. The number of people invited per event dropped gradually throughout the first year of the pandemic. ConclusionsThe mobility and events datasets uncovered different kinds of behavioral responses to the pandemic. Our results indicate that people did in fact change their behavior in ways that likely reduced COVID exposure and transmission, though the degree of change appeared to be affected by political views. Though the mobility data captured the initial massive behavior changes in the first months of the pandemic, the digital invitation data, presented here for the first time, continued to show large changes in behavior later in the first year of the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the rhythms of human activity in the built environment for airborne transmission risk: a large-scale analysis of mobility data 94%
- Direct and indirect mortality impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, March 2020-April 2021 92%
- Disentangling the relationship between cancer mortality and COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the Burden of Influenza on Daily Activity at Population Scale Using Commercial Wearable Sensors 93%
- Geographic and Temporal Patterns in Covid-19 Mortality by Race and Ethnicity in the United States from March 2020 to February 2022 90%
- The Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature with the SARS-CoV-2 Instantaneous Reproduction Number in Counties Across the United States 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public Mobility Data Enables COVID-19 Forecasting and Management at Local and Global Scales 93%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 93%
- How well does societal mobility restriction help control the COVID-19 pandemic? Evidence from real-time evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating seasonal variations in human contact patterns and their impact on the transmission of respiratory infectious diseases 90%
- Relative timing of RSV epidemics in summer 2021 across the US was similar to a typical RSV season 89%
- The Association between Early Country-level Testing Capacity and Later COVID-19 Mortality Outcomes 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.