Back

Quantitative Assessment of 3D Printed Blood Vessels Produced with J750™ Digital Anatomy™ for Suture Simulation

Marconi, S.; Mauri, V.; Negrello, E.; Pugliese, L.; Pietrabissa, A.; Auricchio, F.

2022-01-11 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.01.09.475308 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Blood vessels anastomosis is one of the most challenging and delicate tasks to learn in many surgical specialties, especially for vascular and abdominal surgeons. Such a critical skill implies a learning curve that goes beyond technical execution. The surgeon needs to gain proficiency in adapting gestures and the amount of force expressed according to the type of tissue he/she is dealing with. In this context, surgical simulation is gaining a pivotal role in the training of surgeons, but currently available simulators can provide only standard or simplified anatomies, without the chance of presenting specific pathological conditions and rare cases. 3D printing technology, allowing the manufacturing of extremely complex geometries, find a perfect application in the production of realistic replica of patient-specific anatomies. According to available technologies and materials, morphological aspects can be easily handled, while the reproduction of tissues mechanical properties still poses major problems, especially when dealing with soft tissues. The present work focuses on blood vessels, with the aim of identifying - by means of both qualitative and quantitative tests - materials combinations able to best mimic the behavior of the biological tissue during anastomoses, by means of J750 Digital Anatomy technology and commercial photopolymers from Stratasys. Puncture tests and stitch traction tests are used to quantify the performance of the various formulations. Surgical simulations involving anastomoses are performed on selected clinical cases by surgeons to validate the results. A total of 37 experimental materials were tested and 2 formulations were identified as the most promising solutions to be used for anastomoses simulation. Clinical applicative tests, specifically selected to challenge the new materials, raised additional issues on the performance of the materials to be considered for future developments.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
6
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
9
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
10
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
14
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%