MuTILs: explainable, multiresolution computational scoring of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in breast carcinomas using clinical guidelines
Amgad, M.; Salgado, R.; Cooper, L. A. D.
Show abstract
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) have strong prognostic and predictive value in breast cancer, but their visual assessment is subjective. To improve reproducibility, the International Immuno-oncology Working Group recently released recommendations for the computational assessment of TILs that build on visual scoring guidelines. However, existing resources do not adequately address these recommendations due to the lack of annotation datasets that enable joint, panoptic segmentation of tissue regions and cells. Moreover, existing deep-learning methods focus entirely on either tissue segmentation or cell nuclei detection, which complicates the process of TILs assessment by necessitating the use of multiple models and reconciling inconsistent predictions. We introduce PanopTILs, a region and cell-level annotation dataset containing 814,886 nuclei from 151 patients, openly accessible at: sites.google.com/view/panoptils. Using PanopTILs we developed MuTILs, a neural network optimized for assessing TILs in accordance with clinical recommendations. MuTILs is a concept bottleneck model designed to be interpretable and to encourage sensible predictions at multiple resolutions. Using a rigorous internal-external cross-validation procedure, MuTILs achieves an AUROC of 0.93 for lymphocyte detection and a DICE coefficient of 0.81 for tumor-associated stroma segmentation. Our computational score closely matched visual scores from 2 pathologists (Spearman R=0.58-0.61, p<0.001). Moreover, computational TILs scores had a higher prognostic value than visual scores, independent of TNM stage and patient age. In conclusion, we introduce a comprehensive open data resource and a novel modeling approach for detailed mapping of the breast tumor microenvironment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated quantification of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer from H&E-stained slides using a transformer-based regression model 95%
- The significance of molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer batch correction and dataset integration 93%
- Effect of testosterone therapy on breast tissue composition and mammographic breast density in trans masculine individuals 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope 95%
- Quantification of HER2-low and ultra-low expression in breast cancer specimens by quantitative IHC and artificial intelligence 93%
- Bladder Cancer Prognosis Using Deep Neural Networks and Histopathology Images 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unmasking the tissue microecology of ductal carcinoma in situ with deep learning 95%
- Predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy benefit using deep learning from stromal histology in breast cancer 92%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Attention-based whole-slide image compression achieves pathologist-level pre-screening of multi-organ routine histopathology biopsies 94%
- Clinical-Grade Validation of an Autofluorescence Virtual Staining System with Human Experts and a Deep Learning System for Prostate Cancer 94%
- Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.