Back

Peak Space Motion Artifact Cancellation Applied to Textile Electrode Waist Electrocardiograms Recording During Outdoors Walking and Jogging

Hopenfeld, B. R.

2022-01-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2022.01.07.475456 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundObtaining reliable rate heart estimates from waist based electrocardiograms (ECGs) poses a very challenging problem due to the presence of extreme motion artifacts. The literature reveals few, if any, attempts to apply motion artifact cancellation methods to waist based ECGs. This paper describes a new methodology for ameliorating the effects of motion artifacts in ECGs by specifically targeting ECG peaks for elimination that are determined to be correlated with accelerometer peaks. This peak space cancellation is applied to real world waist based ECGs. Algorithm SummaryThe methodology includes successive applications of a previously described pattern-based heart beat detection scheme (Temporal Pattern Search, or "TEPS"). In the first application, TEPS is applied to accelerometer signals recorded contemporaneously with ECG signals to identify high-quality accelerometer peak sequences (SA) indicative of quasi-periodic motion likely to impair identification of peaks in a corresponding ECG signal. The process then performs ECG peak detection and locates the closest in time ECG peak to each peak in an SA. The differences in time between ECG and SA peaks are clustered. If the number of elements in a cluster of peaks in an SA exceeds a threshold, the ECG peaks in that cluster are removed from further processing. After this peak removal process, further QRS detection proceeds according to TEPS. ExperimentThe above procedure was applied to data from real world experiments involving four sessions of walking and jogging on a dirt road for approximately 20-25 minutes. A compression shirt with textile electrodes served as the ground truth recording. A textile electrode based chest strap was worn around the waist to generate a single channel signal upon which to test peak space cancellation/TEPS. ResultsBoth walking and jogging heart rates were generally well tracked. In the four recordings, the percentage of segments within 10 beats/minute of reference was 96%, 99%, 92% and 96%. The percentage of segments within 5 beats/minute of reference was 86%, 90%, 82% and 78%. There was very good agreement between the RR intervals associated with the reference and waist recordings. For acceptable quality segments, the root mean square sum of successive RR interval differences (RMSSD) was calculated for both the reference and waist recordings. Next, the difference between waist and reference RMSSDs was calculated ({Delta}RMSSD). The mean {Delta}RMSSD (over acceptable segments) was 4.6 m, 5.2 ms, 5.2 ms and 6.6 ms for the four recordings. Given that only one waist ECG channel was available, and that the strap used for the waist recording was not tailored for that purpose, the proposed methodology shows promise for waist based sinus rhythm QRS detection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.3%
2
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
9
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
10
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.9%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
20
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%