Benefits and Cost of a $35 Insulin Cost-Sharing Cap for Medicare Patients
Chua, K.-P.; Lee, J. M.; Tucker, J. E.; Seo, D.; Conti, R. M.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDTo improve insulin affordability, Congress is considering capping insulin cost-sharing to $35 per 30-day supply for Medicare patients. The potential benefits and cost of this cap are unclear. Additionally, it is unknown whether the benefits of this cap would vary between Medicare patients with type 1 versus type 2 diabetes. METHODSWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Database, which reports prescriptions dispensed from 92% of U.S. pharmacies, and the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, a national claims database from Medicare Advantage patients. The IQVIA analysis included patients who only had dispensed insulin prescriptions paid by Medicare in 2019. We estimated the proportion of Medicare patients who would benefit from an insulin cost-sharing cap of $35 per 30-day supply. Among these patients, we calculated the mean annual decrease in insulin out-of-pocket spending. We summed this decrease across patients to estimate the caps cost to the federal government. The Optum analysis included Medicare Advantage patients with diabetes and [≥]1 dispensed insulin prescription in 2019. We used linear regression to compare the proportion of patients who would benefit from a $35 cap and annual savings among these patients by diabetes type, adjusting for demographic characteristics and payer type. RESULTSThe IQVIA analysis included 2,227,229 patients who only had dispensed insulin prescriptions paid by Medicare in 2019. Mean (SD) age was 69.2 (11.4) years. The $35 cap would benefit 887,051 (39.0%) of patients, lowering annual insulin out-of-pocket spending by $338, from $687 to $349. Across all patients in the sample, aggregate savings (i.e., the caps cost to the federal government) would be $299,402,402, or a mean of $134.4 per patient. Among the 60,300 Medicare Advantage patients in the Optum Analysis, mean age was 72.6 (9.3) years; 2,686 (4.5%) had type 1 diabetes and 57,614 (95.6%) had type 2 diabetes. The $35 cap would benefit a higher proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes (64.0%) compared with patients with type 2 diabetes (59.4%). Among patients with type 1 diabetes who would benefit from the cap, annual savings would be greater ($284) compared with their counterparts with type 2 diabetes ($231; p<.001 in adjusted analyses for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONSA $35 insulin cost-sharing cap would benefit a sizable proportion of Medicare patients using insulin and may particularly lower out-of-pocket spending for patients with type 1 diabetes. The estimated cost of this cap to the federal government would be $134.4 per Medicare patient using insulin.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of Portable Electronic Health Record Based Algorithms to Identify Individuals with Diabetic Retinopathy 90%
- Learning Decision Thresholds for Risk-Stratification Models from Aggregate Clinician Behavior 89%
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insulin pricing and other major diabetes-related concerns in the USA: A study of 46,407 Tweets between 2017 and 2019 91%
- Comparative Effect of Metformin versus Sulfonylureas with Dementia and Parkinson's Disease Risk in US patients over 50 with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus 89%
- Nothing About Us Without Us: A Scoping Review and Priority-Setting Partnership in Type 1 Diabetes and Exercise 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 86%
- Estimating productivity losses per HIV infection due to premature HIV mortality in the United States 86%
- Clarifying Values: An Updated and Expanded Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.