Exploring the impact of shielding advice on the health and wellbeing of individuals identified as extremely vulnerable and advised to shield in Southwest England amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods evaluation
Lasseter, G.; Compston, P.; Robin, C.; Lambert, H.; Hickman, M.; Denford, S.; Reynolds, R.; Zhang, J.; Cai, S.; Zhang, T.; Smith, L. E.; Rubin, J.; Yardley, L.; Amlot, R.; Oliver, I.
Show abstract
ObjectiveExplore the impact and responses to public health advice on the health and wellbeing of individuals identified as clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) and advised to shield (not leave home for 12 weeks at start of the pandemic) in Southwest England during the first COVID-19 lockdown. DesignMixed-methods study; structured survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. SettingCommunities served by Bristol, North Somerset & South Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group. Participants204 people (57% female, 54% >69 years, 94% White British, 64% retired) in Southwest England identified as CEV and were advised to shield completed the survey. Thirteen survey respondents participated in follow-up interviews (53% female, 40% >69years, 100% White British, 61% retired). ResultsReceipt of official communication from NHS England or General Practitioner (GP) was considered by participants as the legitimate start of shielding. 80% of survey responders felt they received all relevant advice needed to shield, yet interviewees criticised the timing of advice and often sought supplementary information. Shielding behaviours were nuanced, adapted to suit personal circumstances, and waned over time. Few interviewees received community support, although food boxes and informal social support were obtained by some. Worrying about COVID-19 was common for survey responders (90%). Since shielding had begun, physical and mental health reportedly worsened for 35% and 42% of survey responders respectively. 21% of survey responders scored [≥]10 on the PHQ-9 questionnaire indicating possible depression and 15% scored [≥]10 on the GAD-7 questionnaire indicating possible anxiety. ConclusionsThis research highlights the difficulties in providing generic messaging that is applicable and appropriate given the diversity of individuals identified as CEV and the importance of sharing tailored and timely advice to inform shielding decisions. Providing messages that reinforce self-determined action and assistance from support services could reduce the negative impact of shielding on mental health and feelings of social isolation. O_TEXTBOXStrengths and limitations of this study O_LIThe mixed-methods study examines the experiences of clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) people at the height of the COVID-19 crisis, immediately after the first lockdown in England. C_LIO_LIThe use of an existing list of individuals identified as needing to "shield" from Bristol, North Somerset & South Gloucestershire (BNSSG) Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) allowed for access to key patient groups at the height of the crisis. C_LIO_LIFindings may not be applicable to wider CEV populations due to demographic bias. C_LI C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 96%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of BAME community leaders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intentional and unintentional non-adherence to social distancing measures during COVID-19: A mixed-methods analysis 95%
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 95%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning about COVID-19 across borders: Public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK 95%
- Factors associated with nonessential workplace attendance during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK in early 2021: evidence from cross-sectional surveys 93%
- Parental perceptions of COVID-19-like illness in their children 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 95%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 95%
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 94%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Does pre-infection stress increase the risk of long COVID? Longitudinal associations between adversity worries and experiences in the month prior to COVID-19 infection and the development of long COVID and specific long COVID symptoms 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.