Back

The Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Differ Among Domesticated Maize Landraces - An Experimental Confirmation

Lund, M.; Rasmussen, J. A.; Ramos-Madrigal, J.; Gilbert, M. T. P.; Barnes, C. J.

2022-01-01 microbiology
10.1101/2021.12.30.474574 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIThe plant-associated microbiome has been shown to vary considerably between species and across environmental gradients. The effects of genomic variation on the microbiome within single species are less clearly understood, with results often confounded by the larger effects of climatic and edaphic variation. C_LIO_LIIn this study, the effect of genomic variation on the rhizosphere bacterial communities of maize was investigated by comparing different genotypes grown within controlled environments. Rhizosphere bacterial communities were profiled by metabarcoding the universal bacterial 16S rRNA v3-v4 region. Initially, plants from the inbred B73 line and the Ancho - More 10 landrace were grown for 12- weeks and compared. The experiment was then repeated with an additional four Mexican landraces (Apachito - Chih 172, Tehua - Chis 204, Serrano - Pueb 180 and Hairnoso de Ocho) that were grown alongside additional B73 and Ancho - More 10 genotypes. C_LIO_LIIn both experiments there were significant genotypic differences in the rhizosphere bacteria. Additionally, the bacterial communities were significantly correlated with genomic distance between genotypes, with the more closely related landraces being more similar in rhizosphere bacterial communities. C_LIO_LIDespite limited sampling numbers, here we confirm that genomic variation in maize landraces is associated with differences in the rhizosphere bacterial communities. Further studies that go beyond correlations to identify the mechanisms that determine the genotypic variation of the rhizosphere microbiome are required. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
2
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.3%
4
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
7
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
10
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
25
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%