Evaluation of chest X-Ray with automated interpretation algorithms for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons.
Soares, T. R.; Oliveira, R. D. d.; Liu, Y. E.; Santos, A. d. S.; Santos, P. C. P.; Monte, L. R. S.; Oliveira, L. M.; Park, C. M.; Jin, E.; Croda, J.; Andrews, J. R.
Show abstract
RationaleThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends systematic tuberculosis (TB) screening in prisons. Evidence is lacking for accurate and scalable screening approaches in this setting. ObjectivesTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based chest x-ray interpretation algorithms for TB screening in prisons. MethodsProspective TB screening study in three prisons in Brazil from October 2017 to December 2019. We administered a standardized questionnaire, performed chest x-ray in a mobile unit, and collected sputum for confirmatory testing using Xpert MTB/RIF and culture. We evaluated x-ray images using three algorithms (CAD4TB version 6, LunitTB and qXR) and compared their diagnostic accuracy. We utilized multivariable logistic regression to assess the effect of demographic and clinical characteristics on algorithm accuracy. Finally, we investigated the relationship between abnormality scores and Xpert semi-quantitative results. Measurements and Main ResultsAmong 2,075 incarcerated individuals, 259 (12.5%) had confirmed TB. All three algorithms performed similarly overall with AUCs of 0.87-0.91. At 90% sensitivity, only LunitTB and qXR met the WHO Target Product Profile requirements for a triage test, with specificity of 84% and 74%, respectively. All algorithms had variable performance by age, prior TB, smoking, and presence of TB symptoms. LunitTB was the most robust to this heterogeneity, but nonetheless failed to meet the TPP for individuals with previous TB. Abnormality scores of all three algorithms were significantly correlated with sputum bacillary load. ConclusionsAutomated x-ray interpretation algorithms can be an effective triage tool for TB screening in prisons. However, their specificity is insufficient in individuals with previous TB.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of digital chest x-ray analysis with artificial intelligence software as a triage and screening tool in hospitalized patients being evaluated for tuberculosis in Lima, Peru 98%
- Diagnostic accuracy of three computer-aided detection systems for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis on chest radiography when used for screening: analysis of an international, multicenter migrants screening study 95%
- Diagnostic accuracy study of the multiplex Truenat MTB Ultima/COVID-19 assay for simultaneous detection of Tuberculosis and SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio: defining a normal range, sex-specific differences in the tuberculosis disease spectrum and diagnostic indices 94%
- Adherence trajectory as an on-treatment risk indicator among drug-resistant TB patients in the Philippines 94%
- Immune cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of Ugandan adults who resist versus those who develop latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward Precision Detection of Pyrazinamide Resistance: Critical Concentration Assessment and Rapid Molecular Method Validation 92%
- Detection of new Mycobacterium leprae subtype in Bangladesh by genomic characterization to explore transmission patterns 89%
- A SARS-CoV-2 negative antigen rapid diagnostic in RT-qPCR positive samples correlates with a low likelihood of infectious viruses in the nasopharynx 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.