Towards More Realistic Simulated Datasets for Benchmarking Deep Learning Models in Regulatory Genomics
Prakash, E.; Shrikumar, A.; Kundaje, A.
Show abstract
Deep neural networks and support vector machines have been shown to accurately predict genome-wide signals of regulatory activity from raw DNA sequences. These models are appealing in part because they can learn predictive DNA sequence features without prior assumptions. Several methods such as in-silico mutagenesis, GradCAM, DeepLIFT, Integrated Gradients and Gkm-Explain have been developed to reveal these learned features. However, the behavior of these methods on regulatory genomic data remains an area of active research. Although prior work has benchmarked these methods on simulated datasets with known ground-truth motifs, these simulations employed highly simplified regulatory logic that is not representative of the genome. In this work, we propose a novel pipeline for designing simulated data that comes closer to modeling the complexity of regulatory genomic DNA. We apply the pipeline to build simulated datasets based on publicly-available chromatin accessibility experiments and use these datasets to bench-mark different interpretation methods based on their ability to identify ground-truth motifs. We find that a GradCAM-based method, which was reported to perform well on a more simplified dataset, does not do well on this dataset (particularly when using an architecture with shorter convolutional kernels in the first layer), and we theoretically show that this is expected based on the nature of regulatory genomic data. We also show that Integrated Gradients sometimes performs worse than gradient-times-input, likely owing to its linear interpolation path. We additionally explore the impact of user-defined settings on the interpretation methods, such as the choice of "reference"/"baseline", and identify recommended settings for genomics. Our analysis suggests several promising directions for future research on these model interpretation methods. Code and links to data are available at https://github.com/kundajelab/interpret-benchmark.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- seqgra: Principled Selection of Neural Network Architectures for Genomics Prediction Tasks 98%
- Graph Convolutional Networks for Epigenetic State Prediction Using Both Sequence and 3D Genome Data 97%
- NetTIME: a multitask and base-pair resolution framework for improved transcription factor binding site prediction 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.