Extinction risk modeling predicts range-wide differences of climate change impact on Karner blue butterfly
Li, Y.; Wilson, D.; Grundel, R.; Campbell, S.; Knight, J.; Perry, J.; Hellman, J.
Show abstract
Withdrawal StatementThe authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to the fact that the manuscript has not gone through the US Geological Survey review and approval process required prior to posting and is, therefore, withdrawn. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term changes in populations of rainforest birds in the Australia Wet Tropics bioregion: a climate-driven biodiversity emergency 95%
- Behavior-specific occupancy patterns of Pinyon Jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) in three Great Basin study areas and significance for pinyon-juniper woodland management 95%
- Space use and resource selection of bobcats in the Appalachian Mountains of western Virginia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Eat or Be Eaten: Implications of potential exploitative competition between wolves and humans across predator- savvy and -naive deer populations 94%
- Numerical response of predators to large variations of grassland vole abundance, long-term community change and prey switches 92%
- Autumn larval cold tolerance does not predict the northern range limit of a widespread butterfly species 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling genetic differentiation between Glossina brevipalpis populations from two distant National Parks in Mozambique 93%
- Oil palm expansion increases the vectorial capacity of dengue vectors in Malaysian Borneo 92%
- An ecological niche model to predict the geographic distribution of Haemagogus janthinomys, Dyar, 1921 the yellow fever and Mayaro virus vector, in South America 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.