Back

Home Monitoring for Fever: An Inexpensive Screening Method to Prevent Household Spread of COVID-19

Kim, J.; Threadcraft, M. A.; Xue, W.; Yue, S.; Wenzel, R. P.; Southwick, F. S.

2021-12-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.12.21.21268203 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic surge has exceeded testing capacities in many parts of the world. We investigated the effectiveness of home temperature monitoring for early identification of COVID-19 patients. Study DesignWe compared home temperature measurements from a convenience sample of 1180 individuals who reported being test positive for SARS-CoV-2 to an age, sex, and location matched control group of 1249 individuals who had not tested positive. MethodsAll individuals monitored their temperature at home using an electronic smartphone thermometer that relayed temperature measurements and symptoms to a centralized cloud based, de-identified data bank. ResultsIndividuals varied in the number of times they monitored their temperature. When temperature was monitored for over 72 hours fever (> 37.6{degrees}C or 99.7{degrees}F or a change in temperature of > 1{degrees}C or 1.8{degrees}F) was detected in 73% of test positive individuals, a sensitivity comparable to rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests. When compared our control group the specificity of fever for COVID-19 was 0.70. However, when fever was combined with complaints of loss of taste and smell, difficulty breathing, fatigue, chills, diarrhea, or stuffy nose the odds ratio of having COVID-19 was sufficiently high as to obviate the need to employ RTPCR or antigen testing to screen for and isolate coronavirus infected cases. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that home temperature monitoring could serve as an inexpensive convenient screen for the onset of COVID-19, encourage earlier isolation of potentially infected individuals, and more effectively reduce the spread of infection in closed spaces.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.