Deep learning based models to study the effect of glaucoma genes on angle dysgenesis in-vivo
Gupta, V.; Birla, S.; Varshney, T.; Somarajan, B. I.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, M.; Mahalingam, K.; Singh, A.; Gupta, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo predict the presence of Angle Dysgenesis on Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ADoA) using deep learning and to correlate ADoA with mutations in known glaucoma genes. DesignA cross-sectional observational study. ParticipantsEight hundred, high definition anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) B-scans were included, out of which 340 images (One scan per eye) were used to build the machine learning (ML) model and the rest were used for validation of ADoA. Out of 340 images, 170 scans included PCG (n=27), JOAG (n=86) and POAG (n=57) eyes and the rest were controls. The genetic validation dataset consisted of another 393 images of patients with known mutations compared with 320 images of healthy controls MethodsADoA was defined as the absence of Schlemms canal(SC), the presence of extensive hyper-reflectivity over the region of trabecular meshwork or a hyper-reflective membrane (HM) over the region of the trabecular meshwork. Deep learning was used to classify a given ASOCT image as either having angle dysgenesis or not. ADoA was then specifically looked for, on ASOCT images of patients with mutations in the known genes for glaucoma (MYOC, CYP1B1, FOXC1 and LTBP2). Main Outcome measuresUsing Deep learning to identify ADoA in patients with known gene mutations. ResultsOur three optimized deep learning models showed an accuracy > 95%, specificity >97% and sensitivity >96% in detecting angle dysgenesis on ASOCT in the internal test dataset. The area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, based on the external validation cohort were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.95), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.91) for the three models. Amongst the patients with known gene mutations, ADoA was observed among all the patients with MYOC mutations, as it was also observed among those with CYP1B1, FOXC1 and with LTBP2 mutations compared to only 5% of those healthy controls (with no glaucoma mutations). ConclusionsThree deep learning models were developed for a consensus-based outcome to objectively identify ADoA among glaucoma patients. All patients with MYOC mutations had ADoA as predicted by the models.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Visible light optical coherence tomography of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer reflectivity in glaucoma 98%
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 97%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glaucoma Detection and Staging from Visual Field Images using Machine Learning Techniques 97%
- Automated 360-degree goniophotography with the NIDEK Gonioscope GS-1 for glaucoma 96%
- A Normative Database of A-Scan Data Using the Heidelberg Spectralis Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Machine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 97%
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 97%
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.