Pre-Operative Kidney Biomarkers and Risks for Death, Cardiovascular and Chronic Kidney Disease Events: The TRIBE-AKI Study
Vasquez-Rios, G.; Moledina, D. G.; Jia, Y.; McArthur, E.; Mansour, S. G.; Thiessen-Philbrook, H.; Shlipak, M. G.; Koyner, J. L.; Garg, A. X.; Parikh, C. R.; Coca, S. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundSoluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (sTNFR)1, sTNFR2, and plasma kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) are associated with kidney events in patients with and without diabetes. However, their associations with clinical outcomes when obtained pre-operatively have not been explored. MethodsThe TRIBE-AKI cohort study is a prospective, multicenter, cohort study of high-risk adults undergoing cardiac surgery. We assessed the associations between pre-operative concentrations of plasma sTNFR1, sTNFR2, and KIM-1 and post-operative long-term outcomes including mortality, cardiovascular events, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) incidence or progression, ascertained after discharge. ResultsAmong 1378 participants included in the analysis with a median follow-up period was 6.7 (IQR 4.0-7.9), 434 (31%) patients died, 256 (19%) experienced cardiovascular events and out of 837 with available long-term kidney function data, 30% developed CKD. After adjustment for clinical covariates, each log increase in biomarker concentration was independently associated with mortality with 95%CI adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 3.0 (2.3-4.0), 2.3 (1.8-2.9) and 2.0 (CI 1.6-2.4) for sTNFR1, sTNFR2 and KIM-1, respectively. For cardiovascular events, the 95%CI aHRs were 2.1 (1.5 - 3.1), 1.9 (1.4 - 2.6) and 1.6 (1.2 - 2.1) for sTNFR1, sTNFR2 and KIM-1, respectively. For CKD events, the aHRs were 2.2 (1.5 - 3.1) for sTNFR1, 1.9 (1.3 - 2.7) for sTNFR2, and 1.7 (1.3 - 2.3) for KIM-1. Despite the associations, each of the biomarkers alone or in combination failed to result in robust discrimination on an absolute basis or compared to a clinical model. ConclusionsTNFR1, sTNFR2, and KIM-1 were independently associated with longitudinal outcomes after discharge from a cardiac surgery hospitalization including death, cardiovascular and CKD events when obtained pre-operatively in high-risk individuals. Pre-operative plasma biomarkers could serve to assist during the evaluation of patients in whom cardiac surgery is planned.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HBA Copy Number and Kidney Disease Risk among Black Americans: a Longitudinal Cohort Study 96%
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential contributes to accelerated chronic kidney disease progression 96%
- Prognostic Utility of Total Kidney Volume for Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Prediction: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating Plasma Biomarkers in Biopsy-Confirmed Kidney Disease: Results from the Boston Kidney Biopsy Cohort 96%
- Impaired incretin homeostasis in non-diabetic moderate-severe CKD 94%
- Comparison of low eGFR prevalence and prediction for mortality using 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI equations in Mexican adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Peripheral Transcriptomics in Acute and Long-Term Kidney Dysfunction in SARS-CoV2 Infection 97%
- Packed Red Blood Cell and Whole Blood Perfusates during an Ex-vivo Normothermic Perfusion for Assessment of High-Risk Donor Kidneys 94%
- Nephron Number and Kidney Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectories of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk scores as a predictor for incident chronic kidney disease 95%
- External validation of six clinical models for prediction of unknown chronic kidney disease in a German population 93%
- Health-related hope and reduced distress associated with fluid and dietary restrictions in advanced chronic kidney disease and dialysis: a cohort study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.