Back

Evaluating denoising strategies in resting-state fMRI in traumatic brain injury (EpiBioS4Rx)

Weiler, M.; Casseb, R. F.; de Campos, B. M.; Crone, J. S.; Lutkenhoff, E. S.; Monti, M. M.; Vespa, P. M.

2021-12-13 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.12.10.472139 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveResting-state functional MRI is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is now included in some diagnostic guidelines for severe brain injury patients. However, to ensure high-quality data, one should mitigate fMRI-related noise typical of this population. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of different preprocessing strategies to mitigate noise-related signal (i.e., in-scanner movement and physiological noise) in functional connectivity of traumatic brain injury patients. MethodsWe applied nine commonly used denoising strategies, combined into 17 pipelines, to 88 traumatic brain injury patients from the Epilepsy Bioinformatics Study for Anti-epileptogenic Therapy clinical trial (EpiBioS4Rx). Pipelines were evaluated by three quality control metrics across three exclusion regimes based on the participants head movement profile. ResultsWhile no pipeline eliminated noise effects on functional connectivity, some pipelines exhibited relatively high effectiveness depending on the exclusion regime. Once high-motion participants were excluded, the choice of denoising pipeline becomes secondary - although this strategy leads to substantial data loss. Pipelines combining spike regression with physiological regressors were the best performers, whereas pipelines that used automated data driven methods performed comparatively worse. ConclusionIn this study, we report the first large-scale evaluation of denoising pipelines aimed at reducing noise-related functional connectivity in a clinical population known to be highly susceptible to in-scanner motion and significant anatomical abnormalities. If resting-state functional magnetic resonance is to be a successful clinical technique, it is crucial that procedures mitigating the effect of noise be systematically evaluated in the most challenging populations, such as traumatic brain injury datasets.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
14.2%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.4%
3
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
12
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
13
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%