First and Second Wave Dynamics of Emergency Department Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a retrospective study
Dijk, R.; Plaum, P.; Tummers, S.; van Osch, F.; Barten, D.; Latten, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundSince the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a decrease in emergency department(ED) utilization. Although this has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave(FW), studies during the second wave(SW) are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW, compared to 2019 reference periods. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of ED utilization in 3 Dutch hospitals in 2020. The FW and SW (March-June and September-December, respectively) were compared to the reference periods in 2019. ED visits were labeled as (non-)COVID-suspected. FindingsDuring the FW and SW ED visits decreased by 20.3% and 15.3%, respectively, when compared to reference periods in 2019. During both waves high urgency visits significantly increased with 3.1% and 2.1%, and admission rates (ARs) increased with 5.0% and 10.4%. Trauma related visits decreased by 5.2% and 3.4%. During the SW we observed less COVID-related visits compared to the FW (4,407 vs 3,102 patients). COVID-related visits were significantly more often in higher need of urgent care and ARs where at least 24.0% higher compared to non-COVID visits. InterpretationDuring both COVID-19 waves ED visits were significantly reduced, with the most distinct decline during the FW. ED patients were more often triaged as high urgent and the ARs were increased compared to the reference period in 2019, reflecting a high burden on ED resources. These findings indicate the need to gain more insight into motives of patients to delay or avoid emergency care during pandemics and prepare EDs for future pandemics. FundingNone
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 94%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 93%
- Hospitalizations for emergency-sensitive conditions in Germany during the Covid-19 pandemic Insights from the German-wide Helios hospital network 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
- Non-COVID-19 patients in times of pandemic: decreased emergency department visits and increased out-of-hospital mortality in Northern Italy 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 94%
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 93%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 91%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 91%
- Predictive accuracy of computer-aided versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 92%
- Spread of the SARS-CoV-2 UK-variant in the South East of France: impact on COVID-19 patients’ age, comorbidity profiles and clinical presentation 91%
- Predictive usefulness of PCR testing in different patterns of Covid-19 symptomatology - Analysis of a French cohort of 12,810 outpatients 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.