Back

Staffing levels and hospital mortality in England: a national panel study using routinely collected data

Rubbo, B.; Saville, C.; Dall'Ora, C.; Turner, L. Y.; Jones, J.; Ball, J.; Culliford, D.; Griffiths, P.

2021-12-08 nursing
10.1101/2021.12.08.21267407
Show abstract

BackgroundMost studies investigating the association between hospital staff levels and mortality have focused on single professional groups, in particular nursing. However, single staff group studies might overestimate effects or neglect important contributions to patient safety from other staff groups. We aimed to examine the association between multiple clinical staff levels and case-mix adjusted patient mortality in English hospitals. Methods and FindingsThis retrospective observational study used routinely available data from all 138 National Health Service hospital trusts that provided general acute adult services in England between 2015 and 2019. Standardised mortality rates were derived from the Summary Hospital level Mortality Indicator dataset. Estimates for the effect of clinical staffing from the single staff models were generally higher than estimates from models with multiple staff groups. Using a multilevel negative binomial random effects model, hospitals with higher levels of medical and allied healthcare professional (AHP) staff had significantly lower mortality rates (1.04, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.06, and 1.04, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.06, respectively), while those with higher support staff had higher mortality rates (0.85, 95%CI 0.79 to 0.91 for nurse support, and 1.00, 95%CI 0.99 to 1.00 for AHP support), after adjusting for multiple staff groups and hospital characteristics. Estimates of staffing levels on mortality were higher in magnitude between- than within-hospitals, which were not statistically significant in a within-between random effects model. ConclusionsWe showed the importance of considering multiple staff groups simultaneously when examining the association between hospital mortality and clinical staffing levels. Despite not being included in previous workforce studies, AHP and AHP support levels have a significant impact on hospital mortality. As the main variation was seen between-as opposed to within-hospitals, structural recruitment and retention difficulties coupled with financial constraints could contribute to the effect of staffing levels on hospital mortality.

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 2%
6.2× avg
2
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
#1
34× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 31%
15.6%
4
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 10 published papers
#1
145× avg
5
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 4%
5.3× avg
6
eClinicalMedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 55 published papers
Top 1%
10.0× avg
7
Emergency Medicine Journal
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 1%
8.8× avg
8
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
9
Journal of Hospital Infection
Elsevier BV · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
7.5× avg
10
Age and Ageing
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 27 published papers
Top 2%
7.5× avg
11
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
6.6× avg
12
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
35× avg
13
JMIR Research Protocols
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
6.4× avg
14
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.9%
14× avg
15
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 84%
0.8%
16
BMJ Global Health
BMJ · based on 95 published papers
Top 14%
0.5%