Fusion of Imaging and Non-Imaging Data for Disease Trajectory Prediction for COVID-19 Patients
Tariq, A.; Tang, S.; Sakhi, H.; Celi, L. A.; Newsome, J.; Rubin, D.; Trivedi, H.; Gichoya, J. W.; Banerjee, I.
Show abstract
ABSTRCATO_ST_ABSPurposeC_ST_ABSThis study investigates whether graph-based fusion of imaging data with non-imaging EHR data can improve the prediction of disease trajectory for COVID-19 patients, beyond the prediction performance of only imaging or non-imaging EHR data. Materials and MethodsWe present a novel graph-based framework for fine-grained clinical outcome prediction (discharge, ICU admission, or death) that fuses imaging and non-imaging information using a similarity-based graph structure. Node features are represented by image embedding and edges are encoded with clinical or demographic similarity. ResultsOur experiments on data collected from Emory Healthcare network indicate that our fusion modeling scheme performs consistently better than predictive models using only imaging or non-imaging features, with f1-scores of 0.73, 0.77, and 0.66 for discharge from hospital, mortality, and ICU admission, respectively. External validation was performed on data collected from Mayo Clinic. Our scheme highlights known biases in the model prediction such as bias against patients with alcohol abuse history and bias based on insurance status. ConclusionThe study signifies the importance of fusion of multiple data modalities for accurate prediction of clinical trajectory. Proposed graph structure can model relationships between patients based on non-imaging EHR data and graph convolutional networks can fuse this relationship information with imaging data to effectively predict future disease trajectory more effectively than models employing only imaging or non-imaging data. Forecasting clinical events can enable intelligent resource allocation in hospitals. Our graph-based fusion modeling frameworks can be easily extended to other prediction tasks to efficiently combine imaging data with non-imaging clinical data.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Graph-Based Clinical Recommender: Predicting Specialists Procedure Orders using Graph Representation Learning 95%
- Creating a computer assisted ICD coding system: performance metric choice and use of the ICD hierarchy 95%
- ARCH: Large-scale Knowledge Graph via Aggregated Narrative Codified Health Records Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- A Deep Learning Method to Detect Opioid Prescription and Opioid Use Disorder from Electronic Health Records 94%
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.