Back

Assessing and predicting neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a TRACK-SCI study

Fond, K. A.; Torres-Espin, A.; Chou, A.; Duong-Fernandez, X.; Moncivais, S. L.; Huie, J. R.; Hemmerle, D. D.; Keller, A. V.; Singh, V.; Pascual, L. U.; DiGiorgio, A. M.; Burke, J. F.; Talbott, J. F.; Whetstone, W. D.; Pan, J. Z.; Weinstein, P. R.; Dhall, S. S.; Ferguson, A. R.; Bresnahan, J. C.; Beattie, M. S.; Kyritsis, N.

2021-12-02 pain medicine
10.1101/2021.11.30.21267098 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neuropathic pain is one of the most common secondary complications occurring after spinal cord injury (SCI), and often surpasses motor and sensory deficits in the patient population preferences of the most important aspects to be treated. Despite the better understanding of the molecular and physiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain, reliable treatments are still lacking and exhibit wide variations in efficiency. Previous reports have suggested that the most effective pain management is early treatment. To this end, we utilized the TRACK-SCI prospective clinical research database to assess the neuropathic pain status of all enrolled patients and identify acute care variables that can predict the development of neuropathic pain 6- and 12-months post SCI. 36 out of 61 patients of our study cohort reported neuropathic pain at the chronic stages post SCI. Using multidimensional analytics and logistic regression we discovered that (1) the number of total injuries the patient sustained, (2) the injury severity score (ISS), (3) the lower limb total motor score, and (4) the sensory pin prick total score together predict the development of chronic neuropathic pain after SCI. The balanced accuracy of the corresponding logistic regression model is 74.3%, and repeated 5-fold cross validation showed an AUC of 0.708. Our study suggests a crucial role of polytrauma in chronic pain development after SCI and offers a predictive model using variables routinely collected at every hospital setting.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Frontiers in Pain Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.5%
6
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
8
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
9
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
11
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
16
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%