Back

Assessing and predicting neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a TRACK-SCI study

Fond, K. A.; Torres-Espin, A.; Chou, A.; Duong-Fernandez, X.; Moncivais, S. L.; Huie, J. R.; Hemmerle, D. D.; Keller, A. V.; Singh, V.; Pascual, L. U.; DiGiorgio, A. M.; Burke, J. F.; Talbott, J. F.; Whetstone, W. D.; Pan, J. Z.; Weinstein, P. R.; Dhall, S. S.; Ferguson, A. R.; Bresnahan, J. C.; Beattie, M. S.; Kyritsis, N.

2021-12-02 pain medicine
10.1101/2021.11.30.21267098 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neuropathic pain is one of the most common secondary complications occurring after spinal cord injury (SCI), and often surpasses motor and sensory deficits in the patient population preferences of the most important aspects to be treated. Despite the better understanding of the molecular and physiological mechanisms of neuropathic pain, reliable treatments are still lacking and exhibit wide variations in efficiency. Previous reports have suggested that the most effective pain management is early treatment. To this end, we utilized the TRACK-SCI prospective clinical research database to assess the neuropathic pain status of all enrolled patients and identify acute care variables that can predict the development of neuropathic pain 6- and 12-months post SCI. 36 out of 61 patients of our study cohort reported neuropathic pain at the chronic stages post SCI. Using multidimensional analytics and logistic regression we discovered that (1) the number of total injuries the patient sustained, (2) the injury severity score (ISS), (3) the lower limb total motor score, and (4) the sensory pin prick total score together predict the development of chronic neuropathic pain after SCI. The balanced accuracy of the corresponding logistic regression model is 74.3%, and repeated 5-fold cross validation showed an AUC of 0.708. Our study suggests a crucial role of polytrauma in chronic pain development after SCI and offers a predictive model using variables routinely collected at every hospital setting.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.