Back

A generalized distribution interpolated between the exponential and power law distributions and applied to the walking data of the pill bug (Armadillidium vulgare)

Shinohara, S.; Okamoto, H.; Moriyama, T.; Nakajima, Y.; Shokaku, T.; Utsumi, A.; Chung, U.-i.

2021-12-01 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2021.11.29.470497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Levy walk, a type of random walk in which the frequency of linear step-lengths follows a power-law distribution, can be observed in the migratory behavior of organisms at various levels, from bacteria and T cells to humans. Compared to the Brownian walk, which is also a type of random walk (characterized by an exponential distribution of the frequency of occurrence of step-length), the Levy walk is characterized by the occasional appearance of linear movements over very long distances. In this paper, we propose a general distribution that includes the power-law and exponential distributions as special cases. This distribution has two parameters: the first parameter represents the exponent, similar to the power-law and exponential distributions and the second is a shape parameter representing the shape of the distribution. By introducing this distribution, an intermediate distribution model can be interpolated between the power-law and exponential distributions. The shape parameter measures whether a distribution assimilates a power-law or exponential distribution. In this study, the proposed distribution was fitted to the frequency distribution of the step-length calculated from the walking data of pill bugs. The autocorrelation coefficients were also calculated from the time-series data of the step-length, and the relationship between the shape parameter and time dependency was investigated. The results showed a significant negative correlation between the two (r=-0.61, n=30, t=4.04, and p=0.00037). This means that pill bugs with gait patterns closer to Levy than Brownian walks have a stronger time dependence with respect to step-length changes.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.