Back

Differential regulation of flower transpiration during abiotic stress in plants

Sinha, R.; Zandalinas, S. I.; Fichman, Y.; Sen, S.; Cadenas, A. G.; Joshi, T.; Fritschi, F. B.; Mittler, R.

2021-11-30 plant biology
10.1101/2021.11.29.470467 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Heat waves, occurring during droughts, can have a devastating impact on yield, especially if they happen during the flowering and seed set stages of the crop cycle. Global warming and climate change are driving an alarming increase in the frequency and intensity of combined drought and heat stress episodes, critically threatening global food security. Previous studies revealed that during a combination of drought and heat stress stomata on leaves of many plants are closed, preventing cooling by transpiration. Because high temperature is detrimental to reproductive processes, essential for plant yield, we measured the inner temperature, transpiration, and sepal stomatal aperture of closed soybean flowers, developing on plants subjected to a combination of drought and heat stress. Here, we report that during a combination of drought and heat stress soybean plants prioritize transpiration through flowers over transpiration through leaves by opening their flower stomata, while keeping their leaf stomata closed. This acclimation strategy, termed differential transpiration, lowers flower inner temperature by about 2-3{degrees}C, protecting reproductive processes at the expense of vegetative tissues. Manipulating stomatal regulation, stomatal size and/or stomatal density of flowers could therefore serve as a viable strategy to enhance the yield of different crops and mitigate some of the current and future impacts of global warming and climate change on agriculture. One sentence summaryDuring stress conditions that result in higher flower inner temperature plants use a differential transpiration strategy to protect reproductive processes at the expense of vegetative tissues.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.