Understanding the burden and mitigating risks in the utilisation of the Emergency Medical Services in the management of community mental health emergencies
Howard, I.; Castle, N.; Al Shaikh, L.; Owen, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionMental health disorders are highly prevalent globally with access to appropriate care oftentimes problematic. The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) have been suggested as a potential solution to improve access, however, it is unclear whether these services provide the most appropriate response with respect to the needs of patients experiencing a mental health emergency. MethodsA multi-method study was conducted to assess the current burden and potential risks associated with the transportation of patients experiencing a mental health emergency by EMS. Part 1 utilised a cross-sectional study of routinely collected clinical data for the period January 2018 to December 2019. Part 2 employed a systematic risk identification methodology focused on identifying the hazards associated with the transportation of this patient cohort, to identify key action plans towards mitigating their occurrence. ResultsPatients experiencing a mental health emergency were transported at an average rate of 11.96 per 1000 transports. Approximately 7% were administered prehospital sedation, with Ketamine administered as the most common sedative. Altogether, 50 potential hazards were identified involving the transportation of patients experiencing a mental health emergency. The Patient Assessment subprocess contained the most potential hazards/failure points (n=13). Risks categorized as occasional (n=33) and moderate (n=16) made up the majority. ConclusionThe burden of mental health emergencies on EMS is considerable, with the potential for several significant risks. Despite this, there was unequal focus on the development of care pathways and clinical guidance for this patient cohort compared with the more "traditional" case types serviced by EMS. Consequently, we identified several strategic-level action plans to mitigate these hazards and improve the delivery of care for these patients in the community.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 92%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- EMS injury cause codes more accurate than emergency department visit ICD-10-CM codes for firearm injury intent in North Carolina 94%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Suicide and Self Harm among Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department of a Teaching Hospital in Nepal 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding good communication in ambulance pre-alerts to Emergency Department. Findings from a qualitative study of UK emergency services 95%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 93%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 92%
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 90%
- Challenges in Implementing a Mobile AI Chatbot Intervention for Depression Among Youth on Psychiatric Waiting Lists: A Randomized Control Study Termination Report 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.