Back

Deep Learning-Aided Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases

Cai, D.; Ardakany, A. R.; Ay, F.

2021-11-28 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2021.11.27.21266845 medRxiv
Show abstract

Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) are rare, chronic disorders of the skin and mucous membranes, with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and morphological lesions. Considering that 1) diagnosis of AIBDs is a challenging task, owing to their rarity and heterogeneous clinical features, and 2) misdiagnoses are common, and the resulting diagnostic delay is a major factor in their high mortality rate, patient prognosis stands to benefit greatly from the development of a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) tool for AIBDs. Artificial intelligence (AI) research into rare skin diseases like AIBDs is severely underrepresented, due to a variety of factors, foremost a lack of large-scale, uniformly curated imaging data. A study by Julia S. et al. finds that, as of 2020, there exists no machine learning studies on rare skin diseases [1], despite the demonstrated success of AI in the field of dermatology. Whereas previous research has primarily looked to improve performance through extensive data collection and preprocessing, this approach remains tedious and impractical for rarer, under-documented skin diseases. This study proposes a novel approach in the development of a deep learning based diagnostic aid for AIBDs. Leveraging the visual similarities between our imaging data with pre-existing repositories, we demonstrate automated classification of AIBDs using techniques such as transfer learning and data augmentation over a convolutional neural network (CNN). A three-loop process for training is used, combining feature extraction and fine-tuning to improve performance on our classification task. Our final model retains an accuracy nearly on par with dermatologists diagnostic accuracy on more common skin cancers. Given the efficacy of our predictive model despite low amounts of training data, this approach holds the potential to benefit clinical diagnoses of AIBDs. Furthermore, our approach can be extrapolated to the diagnosis of other clinically similar rare diseases.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
4
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.5%
6
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
8
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
9
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
11
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
17
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Chemical Senses
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
21
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%