Identifying Microbial Interaction Networks Based on Irregularly Spaced Longitudinal 16S rRNA sequence data
Zhou, J.; Gui, J.; Viles, W. D.; Hoen, A. G.
Show abstract
The microbial interactions within the human microbiome are complex and temporally dynamic, but few methods are available to model this system within a longitudinal network framework. Based on general longitudinal 16S rRNA sequence data, we propose a stationary Gaussian graphical model (SGGM) for microbial interaction networks (MIN) which can accommodate the possible correlations between the high-dimensional observations. For SGGM, an EM-type algorithm is devised to compute the L1-penalized maximum likelihood estimate of MIN which employs the classic graphical LASSO algorithm as the building block and can therefore be implemented easily. Simulation studies show that the proposed algorithms can significantly outperform the conventional algorithms when the correlations between measurements grow large. The algorithms are then applied to a real 16S rRNA gene sequence data set for gut microbiome. With the estimated MIN in hand, module-preserving permutation test is proposed to test the independence of the MIN and the corresponding phylogenetic tree. The results demonstrate strong evidence of an association between the MIN and the phylogenetic tree which indicates that the genetically related taxa tend to have more/stronger interactions. The proposed algorithms are implemented in R package lglasso at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lglasso.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended Graphical Lasso for Multiple Interaction Networks for High Dimensional Omics Data 97%
- RCFGL: Rapid Condition adaptive Fused Graphical Lasso and application to modeling brain region co-expression networks 95%
- scPADGRN: A preconditioned ADMM approach for reconstructing dynamic gene regulatory network using single-cell RNA sequencing data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.