Measure by Measure: Resting Heart Rate Across the 24 Hour Cycle.
Speed, C. A.; Arneil, T.; Harle, R. K.; Wilson, A.; Karthikesalingam, A.; McConnell, M. V.; Phillips, J. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundPhotoplethysmography (PPG) sensors, typically found in wrist-worn devices, can continuously monitor heart rate (HR) in large populations in real-world settings. Resting heart rate (RHR) is an important biomarker of morbidities and mortality, but no universally accepted definition nor measurement criteria exist. In this study, we provide a working definition of RHR and describe a method for accurate measurement of this biomarker, recorded using PPG derived from wristband measurement across a 24 hour cycle. Methods433 healthy subjects wore a wrist device that measured activity and HR for up to 3 months. HR during inactivity was recorded and the duration of inactivity needed for HR to stabilise was ascertained. We identified the lowest HR during each 24-hour cycle (true RHR) and examined the time of day or night this occurred. The variation of HR during inactivity through the 24-hour cycle was also assessed. The sample was also subdivided according to daily activity levels for subset analysis. FindingsAdequate data was obtained for 19,242 days and 18,520 nights. HR stabilised in most subjects after 4 minutes of inactivity. Mean (SD) RHR for the sample was 54.5 (8.0) bpm (day) and 50.5 (7.6) bpm (night). RHR values were highest in the least active group (lowest MET quartile). A circadian variation of HR during inactivity was confirmed, with the lowest values being between 0300 and 0700 hours for most subjects. InterpretationRHR measured using a PPG-based wrist-worn device is significantly lower at night than in the day, and a circadian rhythm of HR during inactivity was confirmed. Since RHR is such an important health metric, clarity on the definition and measurement methodology used is important. A minimum rest time of 4 minutes provides a reliable measurement of HR during inactivity and true RHR in a 24-hour cycle is best measured between 0300 and 0700 hours. FundingThis study was funded by Google. O_TEXTBOXResearch In contextResting heart rate is one of the most fundamental and relevant biomarkers in health and disease. Its measurement, particularly in large population studies, is increasingly reliant on sensor devices. No universally accepted definition nor measurement criteria exist. In this study, we provide a working definition of RHR and describe a method for measurement of RHR recorded using PPG derived from wristband measurement. We make recommendations to support future studies of resting heart rate using wearable sensors. C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table 95%
- Validity and reliability of an app-based medical device to empower individuals in evaluating their physical capacities 94%
- Behaviour-based movement cut-off points in 3-year old children comparing wrist- with hip-worn actigraphs MW8 and GT3X 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 96%
- Effects of Electrocardiograms QRS Detection Algorithms in Heart Rate Variability Metrics 95%
- A sweat lactate sensor for detecting anaerobic threshold in patients with heart failure: a prospective clinical trial (LacS-001) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of feature-based indices derived from photoplethysmogram recorded from different body locations during lower body negative pressure 94%
- The complex relationship between effort and heart rate: a hint from dynamical analysis 93%
- An Open-Access Simultaneous Electrocardiogram and Phonocardiogram Database 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparisons of Heart Rate Variability Responses to Head-up Tilt With and Without Abdominal and Lower-Extremity Compression in Healthy Young Individuals: A Randomized Crossover Study 93%
- Effective Assessments of a Short-duration Poor Posture on Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue before Physical Exercise 93%
- Comparing algorithms for assessing upper limb use with inertial measurement units 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of wearable and clinical devices for acquisition of peripheral nervous system signals 94%
- On the reliability of wearable technology: A tutorial on measuring heart rate and heart rate variability in the wild 94%
- Feasibility of Ultra-Short Term Analysis of Heart Rate and Systolic Arterial Pressure Variability at Rest and During Stress via Time-domain and Entropy-based Measures 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.