KBG Syndrome: Prospective Videoconferencing and Use of AI-driven Facial Phenotyping in 25 New Patients
Guo, L.; Park, J.; Yi, E.; Marchi, E.; Kibalnyk, Y.; Voronova, A.; Hsieh, T.-C.; Krawitz, P. M.; Lyon, G. J.
Show abstract
Genetic variants in the gene Ankyrin Repeat Domain 11 (ANKRD11) and deletions in 16q24.3 are known to cause KBG syndrome, a rare syndrome associated with craniofacial, intellectual, and neurobehavioral anomalies. We report 25 unpublished individuals from 22 families, all with molecularly confirmed diagnoses of KBG syndrome. Twenty-one individuals have de novo variants, three have inherited variants, and one is inherited from a parent exhibiting low-level mosaicism. Of the variants, 20 are truncating (frameshift or nonsense), and the remaining five individuals have missense variants (with one of these in three family members). One of the missense variants has been found in at least two other affected individuals. We created a novel protocol for collection and reporting of data, including prospectively interviewing these individuals and their families throughout eight countries via videoconferencing by a single clinician. Participants medical records, including imaging, were reviewed, and data was uploaded to the Human Disease Gene website using Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms. Photos of the participants were submitted to GestaltMatcher and Face2Gene (FDNA Inc, USA) for facial analysis, and we found similar facial phenotypes among the participants. Within our cohort, common traits included short stature, macrodontia, anteverted nares, wide nasal bridge, wide nasal base, thick eyebrows, synophrys and hypertelorism. Seventy-two percent of participants had gastrointestinal complaints and 80% had hearing loss. Three participants were started on growth hormone with positive results. Behavioral issues and global developmental delays were found in most participants. Neurologic abnormalities including seizures and/or EEG abnormalities were also very common (44%), suggesting that early detection and seizure prophylaxis could be an important point of intervention. Twenty-four percent were diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 28% were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Additionally, we have identified minimally reported symptoms, including recurrent sinus infections (16%) and previously unreported migraines (20%). Based on the videoconferencing and these data, we provide a set of recommendations regarding diagnostic and treatment approaches for KBG syndrome.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Next-generation phenotyping in Nigerian children with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 96%
- Documentation and prevalence of prenatal and neonatal outcomes in a cohort of individuals with KBG syndrome 95%
- Known pathogenic gene variants and new candidates detected in Sudden Unexpected Infant Death using Whole Genome Sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: Addition of 67 new patients 97%
- Advancing in Schaaf-Yang syndrome pathophysiology: from bedside to subcellular analyses of truncated MAGEL2 94%
- Cerebral Visual Impairment: genetic diagnoses and phenotypic associations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive phenotyping of 3q29 deletion syndrome: recommendations for clinical care 95%
- Genome sequencing reveals the impact of non-canonical exon inclusions in rare genetic disease 94%
- DYRK1A-related intellectual disability: a syndrome associated with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterozygous and homozygous variants in STX1A cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with or without epilepsy 95%
- BCL11A intellectual developmental disorder: defining the clinical spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations 94%
- Homozygote loss-of-function variants in the human COCH gene underlie hearing loss 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.