Space-time Classification Index for Assessing COVID-19 Hotspots
Haynes, D.; Tiwari, C.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo develop new methods to address problems associated with use of traditional measures of disease surveillance, including prevalence and positivity rates. MethodsWe use data from the public New York Times Github repository to develop a space-time classification index of COVID-19 hotspots. The Local Indicator of Spatial Association (LISA) statistic is applied to identify daily clusters of COVID-19 cases, from July 4th to July 19th. ResultsThe classification index is a spatial and temporal assessment tool that seeks to incorporate temporal trends of the clusters that are "high-high" and "high-low". Two classifications support the index: severity and temporal duration. We define severity as the number of times a county is statistically significant and temporal duration captures the number of consecutive days a county is a hotspot. ConclusionsThe space-time classification index provides a statistically robust measure of the spatial patterns of COVID-19 hotspots. Spatial information is not captured through measures like the positivity rate, which merely divides the number of cases by tests conducted. The index proposed in this paper can guide intervention efforts by classifying counties with six-levels of importance.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Nowcasting for Real-Time COVID-19 Tracking — New York City, March–May 2020 94%
- Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States with surveillance data using a Bayesian Hierarchical model 91%
- A Multivariate Forecasting Model for the COVID-19 Hospital Census Based on Local Infection Incidence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobility was a Significant Determinant of Reported COVID-19 Incidence During the Omicron Surge in the Most Populous U.S. Counties 92%
- Preventing a cluster from becoming a new wave in settings with zero community COVID-19 cases 91%
- A systematic review of the data, methods and environmental covariates used to map Aedes-borne arbovirus transmission risk 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are we there yet? An adaptive SIR model for continuous estimation of COVID-19 infection rate and reproduction number in the United States 90%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 90%
- “Is this Herpes or Syphilis?”: Latent Dirichlet Allocation Analysis of Sexually Transmitted Disease-Related Reddit Posts During the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.