Back

Inhaled Prostacyclin Improves Oxygenation in Patients with COVID-19-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Haeberle, H.; Rosenberger, P.; Martus, P.

2021-11-16 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.11.15.21266343 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) results in significant hypoxia, and ARDS is the central pathology of COVID-19. Inhaled prostacyclin has been proposed as a therapy for ARDS, but data regarding its role in this syndrome are unavailable. Therefore, we investigated whether inhaled prostacyclin would affect the oxygenation and survival of patients suffering from ARDS. MethodsWe performed a prospective randomized controlled single-blind multicenter trial across Germany. The trial was conducted from March 2019 with final follow-up on 12th of August 2021. Patients with moderate to severe ARDS were included and randomized to receive either inhaled prostacyclin (3 times/day for 5 days) or sodium chloride. The primary outcome was the oxygenation index in the intervention and control groups on Day 5 of therapy. Secondary outcomes were mortality, secondary organ failure, disease severity and adverse events. FindingsOf 707 patients approached 150 patients were randomized to receive inhaled prostacyclin (n=73) or sodium chloride (n=77). Data from 144 patients were analyzed. The baseline oxygenation index did not differ between groups. The primary analysis of the study was negative, and prostacyclin improved oxygenation by 20 mmHg more than NaCl (p=0{middle dot}17). Oxygenation was significantly improved in patients with ARDS who were COVID-19-positive (34 mmHg, p=0{middle dot}04). Mortality did not differ between groups. Secondary organ failure and adverse events were similar in the intervention and control groups. InterpretationAlthough the primary result of our study was negative, our data suggest that inhaled prostacyclin might be a more beneficial treatment than standard care for patients with ARDS.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
16
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%