Back

Inhaled Prostacyclin Improves Oxygenation in Patients with COVID-19-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Haeberle, H.; Rosenberger, P.; Martus, P.

2021-11-16 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.11.15.21266343
Show abstract

BackgroundAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) results in significant hypoxia, and ARDS is the central pathology of COVID-19. Inhaled prostacyclin has been proposed as a therapy for ARDS, but data regarding its role in this syndrome are unavailable. Therefore, we investigated whether inhaled prostacyclin would affect the oxygenation and survival of patients suffering from ARDS. MethodsWe performed a prospective randomized controlled single-blind multicenter trial across Germany. The trial was conducted from March 2019 with final follow-up on 12th of August 2021. Patients with moderate to severe ARDS were included and randomized to receive either inhaled prostacyclin (3 times/day for 5 days) or sodium chloride. The primary outcome was the oxygenation index in the intervention and control groups on Day 5 of therapy. Secondary outcomes were mortality, secondary organ failure, disease severity and adverse events. FindingsOf 707 patients approached 150 patients were randomized to receive inhaled prostacyclin (n=73) or sodium chloride (n=77). Data from 144 patients were analyzed. The baseline oxygenation index did not differ between groups. The primary analysis of the study was negative, and prostacyclin improved oxygenation by 20 mmHg more than NaCl (p=0{middle dot}17). Oxygenation was significantly improved in patients with ARDS who were COVID-19-positive (34 mmHg, p=0{middle dot}04). Mortality did not differ between groups. Secondary organ failure and adverse events were similar in the intervention and control groups. InterpretationAlthough the primary result of our study was negative, our data suggest that inhaled prostacyclin might be a more beneficial treatment than standard care for patients with ARDS.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
15.6%
2
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 0.5%
11.3%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 50%
10.3%
4
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
10.3%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 3%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 42%
4.5%
8
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 0.4%
4.5%
9
Journal of Internal Medicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
11
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
based on 16 papers
Top 0.5%
1.6%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 44%
1.3%
13
Pediatric Research
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Systematic Reviews
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
19
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
21
RMD Open
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Neurotrauma
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
25
Thorax
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.7%