Modeling Clinical Trial Attrition Using Machine Intelligence: A driver analytics case study using 1,325 trials representing one million patients
Hutchison, E.; Nampally, S.; Neelufer, I. K.; Zhang, Y.; Weatherall, J.; Khan, F. M.; Shameer, K.
Show abstract
The amount of time and resources invested in bringing novel therapeutics to market has increased year over year with fewer successful treatments reaching patients. In the lifecycle of drug development, the clinical phase is a major contributor to this decreasing efficiency in the development of clinical trials. One major barrier to the successful execution of a randomized control trial (RCT) is the attrition of patients who no longer participate in a trial either following enrollment or randomization. To address this problem, we have assembled a unique dataset by integrating multiple public databases including ClinicalTrials.gov and Aggregate Analysis of ClincalTrials.gov (AACT) to assemble a trial sponsor-independent dataset. This data spans 20 years of clinical trials and over 1 million patients (3,175 cohorts consisting of 1,020,085 patients and 79 curated features) in the respiratory domain and enabled a data-driven approach to identify top features influencing patient attrition in a trial. Top Features included Duration of Trial, Duration of Treatment, Indication, and Number of Adverse Events. We evaluated multiple machine learning models and found the best performance on the Test Set with Random Forest (Test subset: n=637 cohorts; RMSE 6.64). We envisage that our work will enable clinical trial sponsors to optimize trial run time by better anticipating and correcting for potential patient attrition using patient-centric strategies to improve patient engagement, thus enabling new therapies to be delivered to patients more quickly.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigator-initiated versus industry-sponsored trials – Visibility and relevance of randomized controlled trials in clinical practice guidelines (IMPACT) 93%
- Approaches in Analyzing Predictors of Trial Failure: A Scoping Review and Meta-epidemiological study 92%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 94%
- Analysis of clinical trial registry entry histories using the novel R package cthist 94%
- An interactive retrieval system for clinical trial studies with context-dependent protocol elements 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: a scoping review 92%
- Design and implementation of the multi-arm, multi-stage Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (TICO) platform master protocol: An Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) initiative 92%
- A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable AI enables clinical trial patient selection to retrospectively improve treatment effects in schizophrenia 92%
- Implicit bias in Critical Care Data: Factors affecting sampling frequencies and missingness patterns of clinical and biological variables in ICU Patients 91%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.