Evaluation of Pre-operational Factors Contributing to a Dorsal Column Stimulator Explantation
Kinne, M. A.; Cowan, R. S.; Knee, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesImplantation of a dorsal column stimulator (DCS) for axial spine and radicular pain is a commonly performed procedure. Despite the benefits of this device to reduce pain and improve quality of life, some patients elect to have the device explanted. The purpose of this study is to describe pre-operational factors among patients who elected to have their DCS explanted and how these factors are associated with reason for explantation. Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive study using the database of a private outpatient orthopedic clinic. We included all patients who had a DCS explanted between January 1, 2007 and June 19, 2014. Data was collected on patient demographics, past medical and back surgery history, as well as details of implantation, permanent device implantation, and subsequent explantation. Reasons for explantation were categorized as: inadequate pain control using three categories (with no device-related pain/discomfort, with device-related pain/discomfort, or inadequate pain control and patient wants MRI), or pain resolved. ResultsA consecutive sample of 100 subjects who underwent explantation of a DCS was identified for review. Of these 100 subjects, 14 were excluded. Based on our data, we hypothesize that sex (57% female, 43% male) degenerative disc disease (72%), previous back surgery (70%), BMI classified as overweight (subject average = 28.3), history of tobacco usage (57%), and history of narcotic use (80%) may be potential risk factors for explantation. ConclusionsWith respect to clinical evaluation of patients as candidates for spinal cord stimulator implantation, we cannot recommend that any of the evaluated variables be considered a contraindication to proceeding with a trial procedure. Future studies are planned to compare these data to a control group of subjects to establish risk factors predisposing individuals to explantation of a DCS.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 93%
- Restoration of normal central pain processing following manual therapy in nonspecific chronic neck pain 93%
- Cognitive Costs and Gait Parameters During Single- and Dual-Task Conditions: A Comparative Study in Individuals With and Without Non-Specific Neck Pain 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical interventions targeting the nucleus caudalis for craniofacial pain: a systematic and historical review 94%
- Intraoperative laryngeal muscle and heart rate responses to implanted vagus nerve stimulation 88%
- Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Tibial Nerve Stimulation on the Sexual Behavior of Female Rats 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 89%
- Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 88%
- Performance of a Computational Phenotyping Algorithm for Sarcoidosis Using Diagnostic Codes in Electronic Medical Records: A Pilot Study from Two Veterans Affairs Medical Centers 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Measures of Corticospinal Excitability in Black and Hispanic/Latino People with Painful Peripheral Neuropathy 92%
- Adolescents’ Use of Music for Pain Management 90%
- Motor Learning in Response to Different Experimental Pain Models among Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 93%
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 92%
- Chronic Low Back Pain Patient Satisfaction with Lumbar Steroid Injection: a Data-Driven Analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.