Development of novel PCR primer sets for DNA metabarcoding of aquatic insects, and the discovery of some cryptic species
Takenaka, M.; Yano, K.; Suzuki, T.; Tojo, K.
Show abstract
DNA barcoding is a powerful tool that provides rapid, accurate, and automatable species identification by using standardized genetic region(s). It can be a powerful tool in various fields of biology such as for revealing the existence of cryptic species and/or rare species and in environmental science such as when monitoring river biota. Biodiversity reduction in recent times has become one of the most serious environmental issues on a worldwide scale. DNA barcoding techniques require the development of sets of universal PCR primers for DNA metabarcoding. We tried to develop universal primer sets for the DNA barcoding of all insect groups. In this study, we succeeded in designing not only universal primer sets for DNA barcoding regions of almost all insects, which were designed to include a hypervariable site between highly conserved sites, but also primer sets for longer fragment sequences for registration in a database. We confirmed successful amplification for 14 orders, 43 families, and 68 species with DNA barcoding in the mtDNA 16S rRNA region, and for 13 orders, 42 families, and 66 species with DNA barcoding in the mtDNA 12S rRNA region. A key feature is that the DNA fragments of the DNA barcoding regions amplified by these primer sets are both short at about 200-bp, and longer fragment sequences will increase the level of data registration in the DNA database. Such resulting database enhancements will serve as a powerful tool for increasingly accurate assessment of biodiversity and genetic diversity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Taxonomic identification accuracy from BOLD and GenBank databases using over a thousand insect barcodes from Colombia 96%
- Megabarcoding dark taxa - Assessing the utility of mass DNA barcoding for phorid fly species discovery 95%
- Morphometric and Molecular Discrimination of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, (Zehntner, 1897) and the sorghum aphid Melanaphis sorghi (Theobald, 1904) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in the genetic structure between and within two landlocked Ayu groups with different migration patterns in Lake Biwa revealed by environmental DNA analysis 94%
- Foraging niche partitioning of three Myotis bat species and marine fish consumption by Myotis pilosus in a subtropical East Asian region 94%
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Oryctes rhinoceros (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) based on long-read nanopore sequencing 96%
- Acoustic and vibrational signaling in true katydid Nesoecia nigrispina: three means of sound production in the one species 93%
- Application of High Resolution Melt analysis (HRM) for screening haplotype variation in non-model plants: a case study of Honeybush (Cyclopia Vent.) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes over a 10-year Period in the Distribution Ranges and Genetic Hybridization of Three Pelophylax Pond Frogs in Central Japan 96%
- The unseen invaders: tracking phylogeographic dynamics and genetic diversity of cryptic Pomacea canaliculata and P. maculata (Golden Apple Snails) across Taiwan 96%
- Performance and limitations of out-of-distribution detection for insect DNA (meta)barcoding 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of isolation by environment and landscape heterogeneity on genetic structure of wild rice Zizania latifolia along a latitudinal gradient 92%
- Effects of source sample amount on biodiversity surveys of bacteria, fungi, and nematodes in soil ecosystems 90%
- Surface microbiota of Mediterranean loggerhead sea turtles unravelled by 16S and 18S amplicon sequencing 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.