An End-to-End Deep Learning Sound Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants
Gajecki, T.; Nogueira, W.
Show abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) users struggle to understand speech in noisy conditions. To address this problem, we propose a deep learning speech denoising sound coding strategy that estimates the CI electric stimulation patterns out of the raw audio data captured by the micro-phone, performing end-to-end CI processing. To estimate the relative denoising performance differences between various approaches, we compared this technique to a classic Wiener filter and to a convTasNet. Speech enhancement performance was assessed by means of signal-to-noise-ratio improvement and the short-time objective speech intelligibility measure. Additionally, 5 CI users were evaluated for speech intelligibility in noise to assess the potential benefits of each algorithm. Our results show that the proposed method is capable of replacing a CI sound coding strategy while preserving its general use for every listener and performing speech enhancement in noisy environments, without sacrificing algorithmic latency.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Linear versus deep learning methods for noisy speech separation for EEG-informed attention decoding 98%
- 'Are you even listening?' - EEG-based decoding of absolute auditory attention to natural speech 97%
- Speech decoding from a small set of spatially segregated minimally invasive intracranial EEG electrodes with a compact and interpretable neural network 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Algorithms for Estimating Time-Locked Neural Response Components in Cortical Processing of Continuous Speech 93%
- Characterization of Cervical-Cranial Muscle Network in Correlation with Vocal Features 93%
- Resource-efficient Neural Network Architectures forClassifying Nerve Cuff Recordings on Implantable Devices 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.