Back

The Role of Genetic Variation in Maize Response to Beneficial Endophytes

Schultz, C. R.; Brantley, K. M.; Wallace, J.

2021-11-04 plant biology
10.1101/2021.11.03.467096 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGrowth-promoting endophytes have great potential to boost crop production and sustainability. There is, however, a lack of research on how differences in the plant host affect an endophytes ability to promote growth. We set out to quantify how different maize genotypes respond to specific growth-promoting endophytes. We inoculated genetically diverse maize lines with three different known beneficial endophytes: Herbaspirillum seropedicae (a gram-negative bacteria), Burkholderia WP9 (a gram-negative bacteria), and Serendipita vermifera Subsp. bescii (a Basidiomycota fungus). Maize seedlings were grown for 3 weeks under controlled conditions in the greenhouse and assessed for various growth promotion phenotypes. ResultsWe found Herbaspirillum seropedicae to increase chlorophyll content, plant height, root length, and root volume significantly in different maize genotypes, while Burkholderia WP9 did not significantly promote growth in any lines under these conditions. Serendipita bescii significantly increased root and shoot mass for 4 maize genotypes, and growth promotion correlated with measured fungal abundance. Although plant genetic variation by itself had a strong effect on phenotype, its interaction with the different endophytes was weak, and the endophytes rarely produced consistent effects across different genotypes. ConclusionsThis genome-by-genome interaction indicates that the relationship between a plant host and beneficial endophytes is complex, and it may partly explain why many microbe-based growth stimulants fail to translate from laboratory settings to the field. Detangling these interactions will provide a ripe area for future studies to understand how to best harness beneficial endophytes for agriculture.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
5
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
14
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%